Quote:
Originally Posted by ivi0nk3y
It is hopelessly selfish because they chose to be partners in a way where they can not naturally conceive. Why should they be given the care of children just to satisfy their maternal longings?
The child needs a father and a mother and therefore it is hopelessly selfish of homosexual couples to expect to have children as well as be in therelationship of their choosing.
Oh, I thought you were going to try  |
i think that should be up to the child too decide.
I believe that we as humans need something or someone to be able to fall back on. The reason why we choose our parents to be the ones to fall back on is because they are the ones who gave birth too us, and are most probable too take care of us....
what i'm trying to say is that children do not necessarily need a FATHER and a MOTHER to be raised properly. How many children grew up dandy w/ foster parents? or w/ a single mom? or single father???
(the only bad thing about being raised by one parent is that that one parent can't handle all the responsibilities alone)
>.>'
and what's wrong with a homosexual couple adopting a child to satisfy their maternal longings??
isn't that the main reason why ANY couple adopts a child in the first place?
because they can't have children of their own.
(i know this girl who can't have kids because of a miscarriage =.= so i suppose they're going to be forced to adopt or something x.x'' )
and...it should be a mutual benefit.
The child gains parents to raise him/her
The parents sasisfy their maternal longings
all is well