Quote:
Originally Posted by yuujirou
i think that should be up to the child too decide.
I believe that we as humans need something or someone to be able to fall back on. The reason why we choose our parents to be the ones to fall back on is because they are the ones who gave birth too us, and are most probable too take care of us....
what i'm trying to say is that children do not necessarily need a FATHER and a MOTHER to be raised properly. How many children grew up dandy w/ foster parents? or w/ a single mom? or single father???
(the only bad thing about being raised by one parent is that that one parent can't handle all the responsibilities alone)
>.>'
and what's wrong with a homosexual couple adopting a child to satisfy their maternal longings??
isn't that the main reason why ANY couple adopts a child in the first place?
because they can't have children of their own.
(i know this girl who can't have kids because of a miscarriage =.= so i suppose they're going to be forced to adopt or something x.x'' )
and...it should be a mutual benefit.
The child gains parents to raise him/her
The parents sasisfy their maternal longings
all is well
|
I think the response to those comments is obvious...
In most cases adopted children are far too young to have any idea whats good for them.
It's a little strange to be comparing parents to something you fall back on...
Personally, i've never looked at my parents as people to fall back on..
I don't think ivionkey is saying that a child without both a mother and a father will be doomed to have a horrible life, but more that, a child should have the right to have both figures in their life.
I think it's obvious that there is a big difference between a homosexual couple trying to fulfill their maternal needs and a couple that is unfortunate enough to have biological problems...
