Quote:
Originally Posted by MMM
I never said anything about the "problems with orphans" and that gays should rescue orphans.
|
Of course you didn't say it using those words. But whever you said something like "shouldn't a child be taken in by a loving couple instead of ..........." (which you seem to say it as much as I say choice
), to me, that only implies that, not allowing a gay couple to adopt implies that the child will probably never find a loving home etc.
The same goes to the question you asked ivionkey. Asking a question like "what would you choose, a gay couple with the means, or a poor couple...?" seems extreemly limited, and goes to prove nothing apart from that you think there are a lot of children without good homes, so they're given to couples that are unable... I think for the converstation, it would have been better to ask something along the lines of "If you had a choice between two couples that you know would be very loving and caring, and are financially stable etc. One couple is gay, and the other is a standard husband and wife"... which would you choose?"
To me, that's a more realistic question that could prove something. Unless I'm totally missing the points with your questions and comments about the "poor orphans", I don't understand what your posts were trying to prove!
ps. i'm not talking about all your posts. Just the ones comparing a wealthy gay couple and a poor normal couple... and also the one about orphans and going to a loving home!