Quote:
Originally Posted by MissMisa
The reason is that simulated rape would generally give an incorrect message about rape, especially if a younger audience is subjected to it (with the rise of the availability of such media and the internet, this is entirely possible.) It's better if such media doesn't exist. It's more than just the fact that I dislike it. I don't like pornography, but the parties (generally) consent to such practices and whether or not it is a violation of man or woman is questionable. Though I still worry about it's availability to children. (I know children aren't innocent little people who haven't got a clue, but they are more easily influenced.)
Don't get me wrong, people can make their own decisions about the world. But this is just too far. Rape is a horrible thing and shouldn't ever be represented as pleasurable and positive. It gives vunerable people the wrong idea about it.
|
But so many things in the media are illegal things to do in real life, yet still exist. If people were to act them out in real life, it would all be disasterous.
In order to stop things being avaliable to children, both sex and violent products, there are ratings placed on things, or on the internet, credit cards are used. Of course, accidents happen with poor distribution or careless people, but parents have a job to monitor their children, it should not be an issue.
In the end, I'd much rather someone to walk around acting out some sick rape game than someone going around acting out the movie Saw. I think we all would. There is media out there designed to give you a rush other than sexual which is equally as bad, and as equally as inapproriate for children to view. You only dislike this one due to your own personal preference as to what you think is "going too far". Others have tried to do the same with different things already. Eminem got a serving, but served it right back, because it is innocent. People simply disliked the taste. Harmless things should not be discarded due to a single parties preference.