|
08-02-2009, 07:42 PM
Seems like a lot. Wouldn't it be more logical to charge the person in question an amount worth the amount of whatever it was downloaded or shared or whatever? I just couldn't see any person having $22k worth of downloaded mp3s (not ones ripped from already owned stuff) on the computer. I really couldn't see anyone having $675k worth of stuff either. So yeah, I do feel it's unfair and using these people as scapegoats.
In other words, the amount doesn't seem to suit the crime, imo.
Last edited by SSJup81 : 08-02-2009 at 08:02 PM.
Reason: Edit: Weird...page wouldn't load.
|