Quote:
Originally Posted by Tenchu
The "blacks" in Australia always whined about having it tough at school (we shot all the "blacks" in Tassie long ago because we didn't like them, and now they're extinct, and there is only half breeds), yet, as the very moment they whine passes, their parents can be found at the welfare office pleading their "case".
This is not done on a small scale.
Actually, if any race is truly at flaw, it is the whites, because we were stupid enough to legalize "black" welfare and sell grog to the "blacks" on the same day.
|
By "blacks" you're talking about the Australian Aboriginals whom are over-represented in crime and unemployment statistics I assume. It seems like you're confusing welfare with legitimate cultural grievances. If Australia is anything like New Zealand... all citizens are eligible for welfare regardless of race. So "blacks" at the welfare office is not an example of the black man taking advantage of supposed "white" sympathy which you seem to imply is misplaced and excessive.
Cultural historical grievances are a different issue. What sort of historical ethnic grievances do you think are not legitimate? Or what sort of action that the Australian government has taken in trying to settle these grievances do you believe Australia is not obligated to carry out?