Quote:
Originally Posted by xyzone
Yah, I get it. Still nothing specified, just a buzz headline about some "hacked emails". As if that's going to disprove the entire science of climatology and the decades long warnings from various scientific organizations, including NASA and the EPA, backed by raw data from systems like NORAD. What the denialists have is political buzzwords, repeatedly smashed propaganda, and now yet more of it with some unspecified "email hacks".
Why don't you engage the alleged damning evidence? Because there is none. Don't waste your time repeating the same thing. It won't get answered. Either prove how the content of some emails totally rebuff an entire scientific field, or just carry on with yourself.
|
This "buzz" headline is hitting everywhere.
Because you say there isn't any evidence doesn't make it so.
I think the links to many reliable news sources other than Fox News (the best news source) such as CBS and other which you simple dismiss the content of these articles. Not to mention the countless other scientific agencies inside the CBS article is proof enough that the data could be faulty. It would be foolish for any scientist or government to ignore such possible faulty data.
Much of the data from these universities is where government entities acquire their data. This is how this data gets to "NORAD".
There seems to be more than just a couple of E-mails hacked. More like 160 megabytes of E-mail, source programs and data.
Climategate: Why it matters • The Register
Your post reads of blind rage as does of Tenchu's with his kind words.