Quote:
Originally Posted by noodle
You've pretty much misunderstood what I said! But this line here, is exactly what I'm talking about... For you, real (the problem here is the use of "real") scientists are the scientists you agree with! If you can't understand where your problem is with this reasoning, then let's leave it at this!
EDIT: I'll reply and clear up some of the misunderstandings a bit later... too long to do it right now!
|
I don't think you need to ... it was quite clear, understood and well said. Don't try to argue down those who just want to look politically correct or just to look good. Save your time.
He is using "real" scientists like the recent political argument "real" news when the white house attacked fox and talk radio. Well, you see where former White house communications director Anita Dunn went. So we can all hope the whistle blowers with their cracked data will finally get down to the real truth.