JapanForum.com  


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
(#951 (permalink))
Old
JBaymore (Offline)
JF Old Timer
 
Posts: 197
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Hampshire, USA
04-12-2011, 07:58 PM

Reuters:

"GENEVA/VIENNA — An increase in the severity level of Japan's nuclear accident does not mean the public health risk is any worse or that the disaster resembles Chernobyl in 1986, global expert bodies said on Tuesday.

"Our public health assessment is the same today as it was yesterday," World Health Organization spokesman Gregory Hartl told Reuters, explaining that the higher rating was the result of combining the amounts of radiation leaking from three reactors and counting them as a single incident.

"At the moment there is very little public health risk outside the 30-km (evacuation) zone."



best,

.................john
Reply With Quote
(#952 (permalink))
Old
termogard's Avatar
termogard (Offline)
JF Old Timer
 
Posts: 597
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ウラジオストク、沿海地方、露西亜
Post radiation levels - 04-13-2011, 11:36 AM

Radiation in Tokyo returns to pre-disaster level

TOKYO, April 13, Kyodo

The maximum radiation level in Tokyo in the 16 hours through 9 a.m. Wednesday fell to the normal range seen before the occurrence of the nuclear disaster at the Fukushima Daiichi plant on March 11, the science ministry said.

The level fell to 0.079 microsieverts per hour from the maximum level of 0.093 microsieverts detected Monday to Tuesday, returning to the pre-disaster range for Tokyo at 0.028-0.079 microsieverts, according to the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology.

Among other areas, the maximum radiation level in Mito, Ibaraki Prefecture, fell to 0.142 microsieverts from 0.159 microsieverts. The pre-disaster range there was 0.036-0.056 microsieverts.

The level in Sendai, Miyagi Prefecture, where the pre-disaster range was 0.0176-0.0513 microsieverts, dropped to 0.080 microsieverts from 0.084 microsieverts, it said.

But the maximum radiation level in the city of Fukushima, Fukushima Prefecture, home to the crippled nuclear power plant, leveled off at 2.100 microsieverts against the pre-disaster range of 0.037-0.046 microsieverts.

The maximum radiation level in Namie, Fukushima, located 30 kilometers northwest of the nuclear plant, stood at 26.4 microsieverts at 4:20 p.m. Tuesday.

A human being receives radiation of 50 microsieverts from one chest X-ray.

==Kyodo
Reply With Quote
(#953 (permalink))
Old
dogsbody70 (Offline)
Busier Than Shinjuku Station
 
Posts: 1,919
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: South coast England
04-13-2011, 11:56 AM

Fukushima crisis now at Chernobyl level | The Japan Times Online
Reply With Quote
(#954 (permalink))
Old
GoNative (Offline)
Busier Than Shinjuku Station
 
Posts: 1,063
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Inverloch, Australia
04-13-2011, 01:24 PM

It's just a catchy headline dogsbody. If you actually read the article you get some idea of how different the two events actually are. If you read anything from pretty much anyone then you get some idea of the difference between the two events. They are nowhere near the same.

Still not one death and not one person admitted for acute radiation sickness. And unlikely to be any.
Reply With Quote
(#955 (permalink))
Old
JBaymore (Offline)
JF Old Timer
 
Posts: 197
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Hampshire, USA
04-13-2011, 01:31 PM

Let's run the numbers.

Looking at the Fukushima-shi rate: 2.1 microSieverts/hr.

24 hours in a day X 30 days in a month = 720 hours

If you stood outside for 24 hours a day (this kind of radiation is greatly decreased by the sheilding that is provided by common building materials) for the entire month, if the rate remains constant at that 2.1 microSieverts/hr. rate, you'd accumulate a dosage of 1512 microSieverts.

(2.1 x 24 x 30 = 1512)

A microSievert is 1/1000 of a milliSievert. So dividing by 1000 gives you 1.512 milliSiverts of total exposure for that time.

The amount of radiation that a nuclear plant worker is routinely allowed to be exposed to in a year is 50 milliSieverts. One has to think that there is some latitude in that number too.... that at a dosage of 50.000001 the person does not suddenly keel over and die or instantly get cancer. And remember that people have lifelong careers in the industry and aren't dropping like flies. So that is not some sort of "drop dead" (no pun intended) number.

To reach that 50 miliSievert level at the current dosage rate, someone would have to stand outside 24/7 per month for a total of 33 straight months......... 2.7 years!. Of course, no one is going to stant outside 24 hours a day 7 days a week for a month.

If a person was outside only 12 hours of the 24 hours in a day, that doubles the time to reach the exposure limit to almost 5 1/2 years.

Take something off for the radiation that does get through the building materials for the 12 hours of indoor time.... and you are still looking at a LONG time.

Is this normal.... absolutely NOT. But "doom and gloom, we're all gonna die, panic inducing"...... shoudn't be.

best,

.......................john
Reply With Quote
(#956 (permalink))
Old
GoNative (Offline)
Busier Than Shinjuku Station
 
Posts: 1,063
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Inverloch, Australia
04-13-2011, 01:39 PM

And you have to assume that the levels won't decrease at all in all those years but of course they will dramatically, as they have already.
Reply With Quote
(#957 (permalink))
Old
JBaymore (Offline)
JF Old Timer
 
Posts: 197
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Hampshire, USA
04-13-2011, 02:34 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoNative View Post
And you have to assume that the levels won't decrease at all in all those years but of course they will dramatically, as they have already.
Right on, GoNative!
Reply With Quote
(#958 (permalink))
Old
Shaelyn's Avatar
Shaelyn (Offline)
Fae of DOOM!
 
Posts: 183
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Dallas, Tx
Send a message via AIM to Shaelyn
04-13-2011, 04:00 PM

a good comparison, I think:

BBC News - How does Fukushima differ from Chernobyl?



thnx boboloko for the sig!
Reply With Quote
(#959 (permalink))
Old
BobbyCooper (Offline)
Banned
 
Posts: 489
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Germany soon East Asia
04-13-2011, 10:41 PM

Thanks for the BBC News Shaelyn.

Quote:
Originally Posted by termogard View Post
Radiation in Tokyo returns to pre-disaster level

TOKYO, April 13, Kyodo

The maximum radiation level in Tokyo in the 16 hours through 9 a.m. Wednesday fell to the normal range seen before the occurrence of the nuclear disaster at the Fukushima Daiichi plant on March 11, the science ministry said.

The level fell to 0.079 microsieverts per hour from the maximum level of 0.093 microsieverts detected Monday to Tuesday, returning to the pre-disaster range for Tokyo at 0.028-0.079 microsieverts, according to the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology.

Among other areas, the maximum radiation level in Mito, Ibaraki Prefecture, fell to 0.142 microsieverts from 0.159 microsieverts. The pre-disaster range there was 0.036-0.056 microsieverts.

The level in Sendai, Miyagi Prefecture, where the pre-disaster range was 0.0176-0.0513 microsieverts, dropped to 0.080 microsieverts from 0.084 microsieverts, it said.

But the maximum radiation level in the city of Fukushima, Fukushima Prefecture, home to the crippled nuclear power plant, leveled off at 2.100 microsieverts against the pre-disaster range of 0.037-0.046 microsieverts.

The maximum radiation level in Namie, Fukushima, located 30 kilometers northwest of the nuclear plant, stood at 26.4 microsieverts at 4:20 p.m. Tuesday.

A human being receives radiation of 50 microsieverts from one chest X-ray.

==Kyodo
This is very informative

Thanks very much!
Reply With Quote
(#960 (permalink))
Old
siokan's Avatar
siokan (Offline)
JF Old Timer
 
Posts: 395
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: solar system,2ch
04-14-2011, 12:47 AM

2 October 2010
Two people who intruded into to demonstration of Senkaku Islands problem and were arrested.
33660[1].jpg

10 April 2011
Appearance of abolition demonstration of nuclear plant.
Clerk in charge who is inducing demonstration.
MUCPV[1].jpg




Please permit poor English. orz
Cryptanalysis is necessary for you.
set a goal:English at the same level as Johan Cruyff
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




Copyright 2003-2006 Virtual Japan.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6