JapanForum.com

JapanForum.com (https://www.japanforum.com/forum/)
-   Member Art & Creativity (https://www.japanforum.com/forum/member-art-creativity/)
-   -   Photography Styles (https://www.japanforum.com/forum/member-art-creativity/36337-photography-styles.html)

HimeChan13 02-28-2011 01:20 PM

Photography Styles
 
My favorite photography is of body parts (PG!!) like eyes, lips and such. I also love sceneries, but who doesn't? ^.^ What do you think is the best kind? Do you think it's better to edit pictures that are taken or to leave them as they are?

protheus 02-28-2011 01:29 PM

I don't touch any photo, unless the ones I got requested to at work. On my site, I only have one "modified", in which I removed the blur (it was taken at a very high distance).

ryuurui 02-28-2011 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by protheus (Post 853429)
I don't touch any photo, unless the ones I got requested to at work.

Now, that requires skill.

I love photography myself. Especially black and white. I am also against retouching. On the other hand, a good editing requires not only artistic skills but also a great knowledge of the software. It's a rare skill. But I am with Protheus, traditional photography is like calligraphy. It cannot be meddled with or it looses its purity and charm spawned by raw power of light or lines, further mixed with imperfections that only add more flavour.

WingsToDiscovery 02-28-2011 04:09 PM

I don't pretend to be a "purist." The most jaw dropping photography you see today is all retouched. From billboards to travel magazines, you'll have a hard time finding artists among the best who don't/haven't retouched photos to the point where it's almost a niche to not.

ryuurui 02-28-2011 04:10 PM

its not about being jaw dropping but real. not many things are real these days. so what that it is great visually, while it is bleached of naturalness.

HimeChan13 02-28-2011 04:32 PM

I don't know why, but I am almost addicted to editing my pictures. I like to enhance them and make them more than they already are. i don't try to alter it so much that it looks completely different than the original, but I add or take out some of the color, blur the edges for a framed look, alter the brightness or contrast. Minor things like that. I like to keep a natural look to my photos. I would like to get a really nice camera so that I could start to take pictures more seriously. I really like to take photos, but using my phone's camera isn't getting me very far.

tipsygypsy 02-28-2011 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HimeChan13 (Post 853427)
My favorite photography is of body parts

so is mine. like boobs n' butts lol

ryuurui 02-28-2011 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HimeChan13 (Post 853451)
using my phone's camera isn't getting me very far.

You are completely excused. I thought you are talking about pro photography.

HimeChan13 02-28-2011 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tipsygypsy (Post 853454)
so is mine. like boobs n' butts lol

Disregard my PG statement... Hahaha

tipsygypsy 02-28-2011 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HimeChan13 (Post 853479)
Disregard my PG statement... Hahaha

oh you da one started this topic :D

protheus 02-28-2011 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WingsToDiscovery (Post 853443)
The most jaw dropping photography you see today is all retouched.

Overexposure, underexposure and many more effects can be made with the camera itself. Look here, at a relative of mine some photos Flickr: Giuseppe Barillaro's Photostream (ps: at his house I met Valentino Rossi :D ).
He hardly uses editing on his photos, except when he messes around for fun, not at his "work".

PS: This is one of mine, made at 1 AM, pitch black, 60 seconds exposure.Nature calling - Stampede 0536 - Jurnalul M.eu

JayT 03-15-2011 06:33 AM

^Nice photos mate, dig the semi long exposure.
What do you shoot with out of curiosity?

Quote:

Originally Posted by ryuurui (Post 853438)
Now, that requires skill.

I love photography myself. Especially black and white. I am also against retouching. On the other hand, a good editing requires not only artistic skills but also a great knowledge of the software. It's a rare skill. But I am with Protheus, traditional photography is like calligraphy. It cannot be meddled with or it looses its purity and charm spawned by raw power of light or lines, further mixed with imperfections that only add more flavour.

If retouching is such taboo then why do cameras have the ability to shoot RAW formats for editing in post? 99% of consumer cameras can't capture the dynamic range of lighting in a scene and the only way to correct that is by post processing. Adjusting curves, white balance, etc in post is not cheating, cameras rarely see the scene spot on like we do.

Here's a few of my play shots:









Shoot architecture for a living and landscapes for fun

WingsToDiscovery 03-15-2011 06:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by protheus (Post 853497)
Overexposure, underexposure and many more effects can be made with the camera itself. Look here, at a relative of mine some photos Flickr: Giuseppe Barillaro's Photostream (ps: at his house I met Valentino Rossi :D ).
He hardly uses editing on his photos, except when he messes around for fun, not at his "work".

PS: This is one of mine, made at 1 AM, pitch black, 60 seconds exposure.Nature calling - Stampede 0536 - Jurnalul M.eu

Of course you're always going to have outliers, and of course no one will ever have the same skill level. But in truth, unless for artistic purposes, most photographers aren't going for realism as much as they are for sensationalism.

protheus 03-15-2011 08:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JayT (Post 856630)
^Nice photos mate, dig the semi long exposure.
What do you shoot with out of curiosity?

If it's from the Jurnalul M.eu link, it's with my FZ38 (and some with the ex FZ28), from Panasonic, a pretty good bridge camera. If it's about the Flickr link, he shoots with a Nikon, from the high end range (don't know exactly which model, because he changes them pretty often).

protheus 03-15-2011 08:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WingsToDiscovery (Post 856634)
Of course you're always going to have outliers, and of course no one will ever have the same skill level. But in truth, unless for artistic purposes, most photographers aren't going for realism as much as they are for sensationalism.

What the market wants, that is what it gets, just like television , cause even this domain is a consumer driven one. I didn't say it's bad to use post editing, I just gave an example of what can be done directly.

It's true, I don't like to use it, but it's also true that some of the artworks derived from post-processed photos are just wonderful to look at.

JayT 03-15-2011 08:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by protheus (Post 856652)
If it's from the Jurnalul M.eu link, it's with my FZ38 (and some with the ex FZ28), from Panasonic, a pretty good bridge camera. If it's about the Flickr link, he shoots with a Nikon, from the high end range (don't know exactly which model, because he changes them pretty often).

Ahh I see, I used to shoot with Nikon as well.
Keep up the good work!

monkeyninja42 03-20-2011 09:45 PM

Beautiful shots, JayT!
I work with Nikon equipment and Dynalite lights when in studio, but also outdoors in natural light, usually trying for that "golden hour" look!

My website is here (it's flash, so no good on a phone or iPad yet)

www.kathleenandcamera.com

I do some post-editing.....to clear up shadow detail, and to remove zits or huge undereye circles, but that's about it! Catching the right light does almost all the work.

JayT 04-18-2011 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by monkeyninja42 (Post 858139)
Beautiful shots, JayT!
I work with Nikon equipment and Dynalite lights when in studio, but also outdoors in natural light, usually trying for that "golden hour" look!

My website is here (it's flash, so no good on a phone or iPad yet)

Kathleen Miller - Photographer in NYC & Greenwich CT - Fine Art of Your Children, Family, Work & World

I do some post-editing.....to clear up shadow detail, and to remove zits or huge undereye circles, but that's about it! Catching the right light does almost all the work.

Thank you mate!
Very, very, VERY nice website and portraits you have on display!
Lighting is perfect in every shot! I'm guessing you've had a lot of time to perfect your art starting at 15 right? :)





Some of my automotive set not yet uploaded :vsign:


protheus 05-02-2011 09:07 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Flashlight fun in the night.
Attachment 11537


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:07 AM.

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6