Quote:
Originally Posted by JackIsLost
point 4 says informally, a automobile. so... GT-R is a buggy in that sense too...
GT-R is a great car, i will not argue. but the GT-R get's whooped by a cheap "buggy" in your sense. so why get a GT-R if it's no faster than a BUGGY?
after your argument, i highly doubt you know much about sport cars. but much of a fanboy. your first post is pretty much sums up your knowledge "gt-r has a special type of tires with enpowered attachment to the disks so they don't come off that easily in corners"
|
yes i am not even fun boy, i don't even have time to lookup all exact words from dictionary cause it is not important for me and i know ppl understand what i mean even with my non-accurate talk
did you get it at first place?
then, like if i say x-bow is buggy, i am very sure you know why i do say it, i didn't made it up just from nothing and all that your talk around is completely useless. you just want to carry on with your "exactness", because it can be used as car. but i demand much more than x-bow posses to say ... this is a car.
x-bow is car in general but its limited features makes it only a specific type of car which is not a real car.
x-bow might be faster than gt-r based only and only on fact that it weights a ton of material less. so if you take a ton of material from a car you probably looses great amount of luxury (or common car features), and that luxury i think, is essential to say about any object that ... this is a car. ok?