JapanForum.com

JapanForum.com (https://www.japanforum.com/forum/)
-   General Discussion (https://www.japanforum.com/forum/general-discussion/)
-   -   Offspring and the population. (https://www.japanforum.com/forum/general-discussion/22903-offspring-population.html)

Salvanas 02-02-2009 11:14 AM

Offspring and the population.
 
As we all know, there's a current law in China where you are fined if you have more than one (Or was it two?) child/ren.

I for one, think this should be applied, short term, for the whole world. At a maximum of two children per couple. It would reduce the stress on the lack of resources we have at this moment.

What are your thoughts?

Aniki 02-02-2009 02:19 PM

I don't think Japan, Russia and other countries with low birthrates would agree with this law.

Sinestra 02-02-2009 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aniki (Post 671817)
I don't think Japan, Russia and other countries with low birthrates would agree with this law.

um yea what Aniki said take a look at the thread i started about Japan having the lowest birthrate in the world you might change your mind.

Hisuwashi 02-02-2009 02:58 PM

Uh, you get more than a fine if you have more than 1 child in China. That country really doesn't have a great human rights record.

Onyx 02-02-2009 03:19 PM

I would like to help Japan with its low birthrate problem... Seriously..:D

Salvanas 02-02-2009 03:36 PM

Ah, I didn't know about certain countries.

Alright, let's make it about the US and England, and the countries with a larger population and higher birthrate.

ivi0nk3y 02-02-2009 03:40 PM

Or we just stop being greedy pricks and stop hording 75% of the worlds wealth, which is the largest contributor to world resource problems.

noodle 02-02-2009 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hisuwashi (Post 671822)
Uh, you get more than a fine if you have more than 1 child in China. That country really doesn't have a great human rights record.

:confused: What do you mean exactly? Last I checked, there was a fine $900 - $20000 (depends on many things) for having another child, and a lot of families are actually paying this fine.

But anyway, to the subject at hand, I agree with ivionkey.
It's hard for me to say whether the one child policy is a good thing or a bad thing for China. I feel for the chinese that will never know the love of a sibling, but then again, prediction say that the chinese population would be past the 2billion mark had it not been for this policy. With over 1billion, many chinese are suffering, so you can only imagine what kind of famine and poverty would exist if it was 2billion odd!

Aniki 02-02-2009 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Salvanas (Post 671828)
Ah, I didn't know about certain countries.

Alright, let's make it about the US and England, and the countries with a larger population and higher birthrate.

Nope that wouldn't help either. If you'd check the the list of countries by birthrate you'll see that almost all countries in Africa are at the top of the list, so the US and England wouldn't help much to reduce the world's population or the resource problems.

Hisuwashi 02-02-2009 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by noodle (Post 671831)
:confused: What do you mean exactly? Last I checked, there was a fine $900 - $20000 (depends on many things) for having another child, and a lot of families are actually paying this fine.

You can have 2 children in a rural area of China if the first is a girl or disabled. But otherwise, they force women to get abortions, or you can lose rights to free education for your children and other rights. Also the fact that families want boys first and foremost means there are now nearly 3 males to every 2 females in China. But you can't really blame them.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aniki (Post 671835)
Nope that wouldn't help either. If you'd check the the list of countries by birthrate you'll see that almost all countries in Africa are at the top of the list, so the US and England wouldn't help much to reduce the world's population or the resource problems.

This is a good point but Africa doesn't tend to use up so many resources as England and in particular the USA.

noodle 02-02-2009 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hisuwashi (Post 671847)
You can have 2 children in a rural area of China if the first is a girl or disabled. But otherwise, they force women to get abortions, or you can lose rights to free education for your children and other rights. Also the fact that families want boys first and foremost means there are now nearly 3 males to every 2 females in China. But you can't really blame them.

I'm not too sure if you're talking about China today or 30+ years ago. As for Rural China, where is that exactly? Places like Tibet for example don't even have this one Child Policy and you can't really get more rural than that!

Lol, the 3 for 2 isn't so bad... You should check the ratio's for India!:eek:

Hisuwashi 02-02-2009 04:36 PM

Rural China = any kind of settlement in The People's Republic of China (ok, excluding Tibet, who are autonomous anyway) without at least a non-agricultural population of 100,000.

City - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jaydelart 02-08-2009 01:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Salvanas (Post 671774)
As we all know, there's a current law in China where you are fined if you have more than one (Or was it two?) child/ren.

I for one, think this should be applied, short term, for the whole world. At a maximum of two children per couple. It would reduce the stress on the lack of resources we have at this moment.

What are your thoughts?

You get fines for damaging property or littering... are we placing human lives in the same category as objects? I think if people choose to have more than 2 children, they should have the freedom to do so without being "punished".
As for the world's resources, we could always try to be more responsible.

superheel 02-08-2009 02:22 AM

I think this should apply to some countries in the world. China really needs that law, and maybe they should make a law that each couple should have atleast 1 daughter. China needs women.

Nagoyankee 02-08-2009 05:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by superheel (Post 673490)
China really needs that law, and maybe they should make a law that each couple should have atleast 1 daughter. China needs women.

Just whatever for? :confused:

Yuna7780 02-08-2009 05:53 AM

I know that China has a population problem... But I just don't think it's right to not be able to have more than one/two children. It's one of those personal things.

mrnicekid 02-08-2009 06:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yuna7780 (Post 673547)
I know that China has a population problem... But I just don't think it's right to not be able to have more than one/two children. It's one of those personal things.

when i first heard about the china's one-child policy, my first reaction is just like you.

then i met real chinese people, and through our discussion, it was obvious that the policy is much needed in a big country like china. it's whether the one child policy, or china separated into various countries for easier governance.

the thing is, they also spoke about rural families taking medication so that when a mother gave birth, she would gave birth to as many children as possible, because it is OK to have multiple children, as long as they came during the same birth. pills to make quadruplets were widely use, because rural families need several strong sons to help them with their farm etc.

the importance of having a son is also significant, as the son is going to bear the family name, and since the wife is going to be with her husband, the family with only one daughter is left with no one to take care of them when their daughter is wed off.

it has been like... 20 years? since they implement the policy, and i'm very interested to know to what extent the impact has been to china, socially and economically.

is it a successful policy?

burkhartdesu 02-08-2009 06:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aniki (Post 671835)
Nope that wouldn't help either. If you'd check the the list of countries by birthrate you'll see that almost all countries in Africa are at the top of the list, so the US and England wouldn't help much to reduce the world's population or the resource problems.

To say that reducing the birthrate in America and England wouldn't help much to reduce the worlds resource problems is silly, and I know you secretly know that as well.

Considering America uses more oil than the rest of the world combined, I think we have a pretty big dent in good ol' mother nature.

And did you know that California now uses more oil than CHINA? Yes! China, the very country that sparked this ridiculous conversation.

California alone uses more gasoline than any country in the world (except the US as a whole, of course). That means California's 20 billion gallon gasoline and diesel habit is greater than China's! (Or Russia's. Or India's. Or Brazil's. Or Germany's.) :vsign:

Here is a chart from a bp oil consumption statistics website

Note that both China and South Africa use the least oil.
And the funny thing is, America is so brainwashed by Christianity that they're trying to keep people from getting birth control and legal abortions..

Jaydelart 02-08-2009 09:03 AM

Don't pounce on Christians too hard. In general, people don't like the loss of a life; I'm sure it's not just Christians that are disturbed by abortion.
I thought it necessary to clarify, lest an anti-Christian sentiment arose in this debate.


Let's try to keep things relatively respectful, especially when dealing with such a sensitive issue.

To set a more moderate tone, let me just add that I, as a Christian, in regard to abortion, wouldn't mind either way. Could that mean I'm not completely brainwashed? :D

mrnicekid 02-08-2009 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jaydelart (Post 673586)
To set a more moderate tone, let me just add that I, as a Christian, in regard to abortion, wouldn't mind either way. Could that mean I'm not completely brainwashed? :D

Oh Lord! Have mercy on this one whose soul is not completely brainwashed... yet.

:D

ThirdSight 02-08-2009 11:31 PM

Us Americans could stop being so fat.

Hell, that'd take care of resource management, toxic waste, and the danger of the hole in the O-Zone layer all in one go.

Acidreptile 02-09-2009 01:28 PM

Offspring?Hmm I only know the band.

zed 02-11-2009 06:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Salvanas (Post 671774)
As we all know, there's a current law in China where you are fined if you have more than one (Or was it two?) child/ren.

I for one, think this should be applied, short term, for the whole world. At a maximum of two children per couple. It would reduce the stress on the lack of resources we have at this moment.

What are your thoughts?

What kind of resources are you talking about?
because the world actualy produces more than enough food to feed everybody agriculture alone produces seventeen percent more calories per person than it did 30 years ago even though the population grew 70% the problem is that poor people don't have te money to aford it.

and about the offspring restriction, I am against it I've got five brothers and one sister and I can't imagine it any other way.

Tsuzuki 03-07-2009 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acidreptile (Post 673912)
Offspring?Hmm I only know the band.

and I only love this song from them xD



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:46 PM.

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6