JapanForum.com

JapanForum.com (https://www.japanforum.com/forum/)
-   General Discussion (https://www.japanforum.com/forum/general-discussion/)
-   -   Photo Posting WARNING (https://www.japanforum.com/forum/general-discussion/25300-photo-posting-warning.html)

ozkai 05-21-2009 08:49 AM

Photo Posting WARNING
 
I've noticed a lot of users here use a site named "Facebook".

Please read this BBC article below which is a healthy warning wishing to post naked photos or any secret photos of their GF'S on it. This also applies to girls:)





Facebook says images are removed from its servers immediately.
User photographs can still be found on many social networking sites even after people have deleted them, Cambridge University researchers have said. They put photos on 16 popular websites - noting the web addresses where the images were stored - and deleted them.
The team said it was able to find them on seven sites - including Facebook - using the direct addresses, even after the photos appeared to have gone.
Facebook says deleted photos are removed from its servers "immediately".
The Cambridge University researchers said special photo-sharing sites, such as Flickr and Google's Picasa, did better and Microsoft's Windows Live Spaces removed the photos instantly.
To perform their experiment, the researchers uploaded photos to each of the sites, then deleted them, but kept a note of direct URLs to the photos from the sites' content delivery networks.
When they checked 30 days later, these links continued to work for seven of the sites even though a typical user might think the photos had been removed.
Lazy approach
Joseph Bonneau, one of the PhD students who carried out the study, said: "This demonstrates how social networking sites often take a lazy approach to user privacy, doing what's simpler rather than what is correct.
"It's imperative to view privacy as a design constraint, not a legal add-on."
But a Facebook spokesman defended the company's approach saying; "When a user deletes a photograph from Facebook it is removed from our servers immediately.
"However, URLs to photographs may continue to exist on the Content Delivery Network (CDN) after users delete them from Facebook, until they are overwritten.
"Overwriting usually happens after a short period of time."
Users of Facebook staged a revolt recently over rules which would have given the site permanent ownership of their data.

User photographs can still be found on many social networking sites even after people have deleted them, Cambridge University researchers have said.
They put photos on 16 popular websites - noting the web addresses where the images were stored - and deleted them.
The team said it was able to find them on seven sites - including Facebook - using the direct addresses, even after the photos appeared to have gone.
Facebook says deleted photos are removed from its servers "immediately".
The Cambridge University researchers said special photo-sharing sites, such as Flickr and Google's Picasa, did better and Microsoft's Windows Live Spaces removed the photos instantly.
To perform their experiment, the researchers uploaded photos to each of the sites, then deleted them, but kept a note of direct URLs to the photos from the sites' content delivery networks.
When they checked 30 days later, these links continued to work for seven of the sites even though a typical user might think the photos had been removed.
Lazy approach
Joseph Bonneau, one of the PhD students who carried out the study, said: "This demonstrates how social networking sites often take a lazy approach to user privacy, doing what's simpler rather than what is correct.
"It's imperative to view privacy as a design constraint, not a legal add-on."
But a Facebook spokesman defended the company's approach saying; "When a user deletes a photograph from Facebook it is removed from our servers immediately.
"However, URLs to photographs may continue to exist on the Content Delivery Network (CDN) after users delete them from Facebook, until they are overwritten.
"Overwriting usually happens after a short period of time."
Users of Facebook staged a revolt recently over rules which would have given the site permanent ownership of their data.

iPhantom 05-21-2009 08:55 AM

Not surprised. Facebook has never been transparent on anything.

SHAD0W 05-21-2009 09:56 AM

Funny how you post this, Ozkai, after what you said about VampireGirls questionable photography.

iPhantom 05-21-2009 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SHAD0W (Post 720333)
Funny how you post this, Ozkai, after what you said about VampireGirls questionable photography.

Apparently he doesn't like such photos to be posted only on Facebook :mtongue:

ozkai 05-21-2009 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SHAD0W (Post 720333)
Funny how you post this, Ozkai, after what you said about VampireGirls questionable photography.

I think her photography is shmicko!

I disagree somewhat on the camera.. It seems to not be to clear.. Maybe it's the lense..

ozkai 05-21-2009 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iPhantom (Post 720334)
Apparently he doesn't like such photos to be posted only on Facebook :mtongue:

I didn't even know what Facebook was until I saw it on BBC and did a Google searched.

Seems like it's good for your young one's, but DEFINITELY not for me..

I have a SmugMug Photo Sharing. Your photos look better here. account and I post photos on it.. Failing that, I email them to friends and family, and a lot of media stays on my 500GB external hardy;)


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:48 AM.

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6