JapanForum.com

JapanForum.com (https://www.japanforum.com/forum/)
-   General Discussion (https://www.japanforum.com/forum/general-discussion/)
-   -   Allies helping allies (https://www.japanforum.com/forum/general-discussion/36156-allies-helping-allies.html)

MMM 02-16-2011 09:43 PM

Allies helping allies
 
On a separate thread I said the following:

"If our ally is being attacked then it is not only our duty but a requirement to help them. If that help is in the form of military defense and is what is needed, then that is what happens."

It was suggested that this is quite an offensive position. However, to me, it seems like normal diplomacy and how countries relate to each other.

Is this a mistaken notion?

Suki 02-16-2011 11:10 PM

LOL

Awww really, MMM?

Anyway, my thoughts on this topic have been made fairly clear in other threads. I'll just sit back and read, for a change.

MMM 02-16-2011 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suki (Post 851469)
LOL

Awww really, MMM?

Anyway, my thoughts on this topic have been made fairly clear in other threads. I'll just sit back and read, for a change.

Too bad. I was curious to hear your explanation as to what is wrong with allies helping allies.

Suki 02-16-2011 11:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MMM (Post 851471)
Too bad. I was curious to hear your explanation as to what is wrong with allies helping allies.

Wha-? AGAIN!?

Aight, I'll make it short and simple cause I really don't wanna engage in this conversation once again: it is WRONG if the help comes in the form of blatant violence, which happened to be the case (and still is every time the US joins in on a military takeover).

MMM 02-16-2011 11:49 PM

I think at some point we were talking about what if N. Korea were to invade Japan, should allies like the US send military support. In this case it would involve shooting N. Korean soldiers so they don't kill Japanese soldiers. If this isn't the definition of an ally, I don't know what is.

xkmkmlmx 02-16-2011 11:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Suki (Post 851472)
Wha-? AGAIN!?

Aight, I'll make it short and simple cause I really don't wanna engage in this conversation once again: it is WRONG if the help comes in the form of blatant violence, which happened to be the case (and still is every time the US joins in on a military takeover).

So precise violence is ok, but blatant is not?

How do you apply this logic to a friend (ally) that you are walking home with, who is suddenly physically attacked?

WingsToDiscovery 02-16-2011 11:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xkmkmlmx (Post 851475)
So precise violence is ok, but blatant is not?

How do you apply this logic to a friend (ally) that you are walking home with, who is suddenly physically attacked?

You help to kick the attacker's ass.

siokan 02-17-2011 12:13 AM

weapon export country vs weapon export country

catch22

Elenwe 02-17-2011 12:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MMM (Post 851453)
On a separate thread I said the following:

"If our ally is being attacked then it is not only our duty but a requirement to help them. If that help is in the form of military defense and is what is needed, then that is what happens."

It was suggested that this is quite an offensive position. However, to me, it seems like normal diplomacy and how countries relate to each other.

Is this a mistaken notion?

Not necessarily by means of arms... you can try to help your ally disolve the problem by using diplomacy. Say if you were in a governmental position and don't agree with your ally country's actions, would you still hold this position? But yeah, I don't think it's offensive though, it's the internet.

MMM 02-17-2011 12:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elenwe (Post 851483)
Not necessarily by means of arms... you can try to help your ally disolve the problem by using diplomacy. Say if you are in a governmental position and don't agree with your ally country's actions, would you still hold this position?

Read closely what I wrote. If your ally is in trouble, I believe it is your responsibility to help them. That help MAY be in the form of military support or arms, but then again it may not.

I don't understand your question. Can you give an example?


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:13 AM.

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6