![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If the Red Cross have problems with funding then they can invoice the Japanese government. I am happy to give to the red cross but I'll earmark my money for use in other disasters that need my MONEY. |
Quote:
You haven't paraphrased my point correctly at all. |
Quote:
Japan is the worlds third richest country in the world. The estimated cost is large. But it's well within the capabilities of the Japanese economy which will no doubt take a hit... but the worst that can happen is that it becomes the world's fourth richest country as opposed to being the world's third richest country for a little bit... whoop dee do. |
This hasn't even ended yet. Nobody knows how long this is gonna take.
At least Christchurch and Haiti were just ONE EARTHQUAKE. It's not gonna be easy to rebuild all those houses. |
Ronin, who are you to decide which countries deserve charity?
People need assistance when tragedy happens no matter if the country is poor or not. |
I don't see anything wrong with donating to the Red Cross. They will make a best judgement of how the money will be used, it can go to Japan, it can go to another country that needs the aid.
To Misa's point, Red Cross doesn't operate off of government funding. And if government is to give Red Cross any funds, they will have other organization to answer to... |
Quote:
You are the one who is wrong; nearly all your posts state in so many words; 'Japan is a rich country and therefore does not need aid.' This is incorrect as the rescue effort, along with re-housing, rebuilding and staving off a potential nuclear disaster all contribute to expenses the country can ill afford - the country is debt like many other places. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:13 PM. |