 |
|
|
||||
|
||||
|
05-27-2011, 01:57 AM
Back in the day the land of Israel was taken over and the 12 tribes were dispersed. And in 1948 the state of Israel was re established therefore they "returned"....I find it hard to believe that your feign ignorance to that detail.
My Property:Pexster, Slykaz1 If the ocean was vodka and i was a duck, i would go to the bottom and drink my way up but the ocean isn't vodka and i'm no duck so pass up the bottle and shut the hell up! Score: Eiri: 43 Slykaz1: 78Rojjin: 59 Yuna7780: 79 reihino:15 Crani:22 Ramones1976:0 AnimeBaby:3 Arikado:1 Kikibunny23:3
|
|
|
||||
|
||||
|
05-27-2011, 02:31 AM
Quote:
Quote:
But if you're correct and this will ultimately be decided by the complete destruction of the other, then this conflict is one that Israel will lose in the long term despite having the advantage at the moment due to considerable US support. I mean as soon as it is strategically unteneble for the USA to support Israel they won't. So it is actually in the best interests of Israel for a long term peace. After all... time and numbers are on the Arabs side... as are the growing ever more powerful day-by-day Chinese and Russians.
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
05-27-2011, 04:57 AM
Quote:
America took its country from a myriad of Native American nations and peoples....as well as from Mexico....but then again Mexico was taken from the natives by the Spanish soooooo (Spanish ppl themselves may be gone from mexico but their influence is clearly there) Modern Japanese people exist because their ancestors crossed the sea and conquered the native Jomon peoples that inhabited Japan before them. Modern Germans are culturally and genetically the way they are because they were able to halt Roman armies from incorperating them into the Roman Empire....The Romans were hugely responsible for the genetic make up of Europe, North Africa , Asia minor and parts of the Middle East. That being said, I support Israel because war and legal purchasing of land are the only two ways of acquiring land IMO....and sure the manner in which the Jews acquired their land maybe sketchy but they were able to fight off their Arab neighbors for decades....their army is pretty strong. If they are able to maintain their countries borders militarily, I think they deserve to be there..... although Im fairly certain they only have the power they do now because of US support through the decades....Over time though I think they will be taken over by Palestine again as the US and its allies lose interest in the region. A flash in a pan
|
|
|
||||
|
||||
|
05-28-2011, 02:35 AM
Quote:
It wasn't via either of these methods. In fact I would liken it to the way in which peace via a two state solution is being attempted at being brokered today. I support the right of Palestine to exist via a two state solution because I have a conscience.
|
|
|
||||
|
||||
|
05-28-2011, 02:45 AM
Quote:
2- The Germanic tribes didn't actually halt Roman armies nor do Germans differ all that much culturally and genetically from Western Europeans. Aside from these factual innacuracies.. this darwinian worldview of International Relations is simply out of date in an increasingly globalised world.
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
05-28-2011, 03:55 AM
Ronin, I am far more aware of the situation in the Middle east and the actual players involved than you seem to be. Muslims are prepareing for the arrival of the Madi, Geez dude, the Iranian president talks about his arrival all the time.
This isn't some joke, these folks seriously believe this stuff. That's where your running into difficulty, the middle east is the foundation of multiple world relgions. The focal point is Jeruslam, it allways has been. The Mother of all wars will be fought over it. The Muslims believe this, the Christians believe this and the Jews believe this. It's called the end times, and a third of the world's population believes in it... You can't consider anything in the Middle east without the relgious conotation, everything that happens there is going to be considered in those terms. . You can't look at this with reason because reason has nothing to do with's what's going on, or what will happen in the near future.
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
05-28-2011, 05:26 AM
Quote:
1. First, the Jomon were not purely hunter gathers by the time the Yayoi started arriving....they developed limited agriculture by then from the early immigrants who were small enough in number to be assimilated rather than conquering the Jomon. Your talking about the early jomon era when Japan was completely isolated and the Jomon had no contact with Koreans and Chinese explorers. In the later times the Yayoi started arriving in greater numbers from China (Xu Fu's expedition as well as villagers fleeing the wars in China at the time. these masses of people founded their own Yayoi kingdoms in japan, each trying to win dominance of the region over their other Yayoi neighbors as well as Jomon. ultimately tho, as u said it was the Yayoi culture that ultimately took over the Jomon not in war. A popular theory is that Empress Consort Jingu was actually Queen Himiko and that the "land across the sea where riches lay" that she conquered was a Jomon chiefdom on Shikoku, not Korea. Also im quite certain there was conflict between the two peoples, at least to some degree. The Yayoi did not just skirt around Jomon occupied areas. Most of them landed in Kyushu because that is the closest port from Korea and Jiangsu, China were they came from. They most likely had to battle the natives who occupied northern Kyushu and pushed them north into Honshu. They did not venture south because of mountainous terrain and the fact that the Kumaso ( a Malay or Polynesian peoples) already occupied it and repelled them time and time again. overtime the Jomon in the rest of Japan became Yayoi thru cultural imperialism....then in the 3rd century a massive invasion from the Baekje kingdom in Korea occurred and those peoples defeated Yamataikoku (a conglomerate of Yayoi kingdoms, a UN of ancient Japan if u will) and went on to subjugate the rest of Japan over the next millennia. The Japanese government will never recognize that becasue it would change the foundation of their identity as a people...however in Western academia (at least in America) its pretty accepted that Baekje did invade Japan mid 3rd century to become the dominant nation state. Sometime between 250-270 in the Gaya Confederacy, Korea the younger brother of the King Mapun led a revolt against the King. This younger brother is named Ungjin or Homuda....King Mapun put down the insurrection and his brother, his troops and his people were forced to flee to Baekje in southwestern Korea. King Goi of Baekje was concerned about the mass influx of refugees from Gaya and told Ungjin to go to Wa (Japan) with his men and start a country there free from the clutches of his angry brother Mapun. So in 270 AD Ungjin led an invasion of Japan from Korea with his refugees and troops and defeated Yamataikoku and settled in the Yamato plain. The Japanese government wants to hide tha fact that Yamataikoku was conquered by Koreans so they wiped out Himikos name, history and made it look like Ojin was already present in Japan as a Japanese, where in reality he was from Korea. Anyway, Ungjin convinced Queen Iyo (Natsuka hime) to marry him after he defeated the native Wa-jin. His name was changed to Ojin and this was the start of the Kofun period- marked by large korean style tombs, the introduction of horses from Korea and a HUGE influx of people unexplainable by natural means and only by migration. The Japanese want everyone to believe they have always been in the islands and ruled there since the beginning of time. They portray Yamato Japan as having had a good diplomatic relationship with Baekje, exchanging culture, writing, architecture and weapons in exchange for Japanese troops to aid Baekje in its conflicts with other Korean kingdoms. This is true to some extent, they were indeed allies and exchanged what I listed above, but what the japanese scholars hide is that they were originally from Korea as well....that is why they had a good diplomatic relationship with Baekje, they were a colony in the Japanese islands. Historians have ALWAYS pondered why Yamato Japan would throw its entire economy and armed forces into the Battle of Baekgang (Yamato and Baekje vs Silla and Tang, China), now we know its because Japan was a colony trying to re-capture its homeland from its enemies. It would be comparable to if the American colonies remained loyal to England....and England was invaded and taken over by France. The American colonies muster what armies and supplies it can and try to recapture Britain from France....that is an easier way to understand it. The elaborate stories in the Kojiki describing Japans first gods and heros who conquered enemies and land were fanciful depictions of the first Yayoi generals conquering their territory from the natives. This is the leading theory because the Japanese have shown a tendancy to demonize their former enemies and subjects by giving them names such as "tsuchigumo" or Earth Spider, calling the Kumaso ppl Kumaso (Bear-like) and naming the Hayato, Hayato because it means "barking servant" or something like that (because the Hayao ppls made barking noises in celebration). 2. The Roman armies repeatedly made incursions into Germania but the Germans would simply melt into the forests and wait for the Romans to leave or ambush them. Rome couldnt get a foothold in Germania, they attempted to send a legion into the heart of Germania but were ambushed and anniahliated (Teutoburg Forest). After that the Romans fortified their borders on the Rhine, never to attempt more incursions. I guess I should have been clearer on what I meant by genetic similiarities. Yes, the German people do share a number of the same genetics as other Western Europeans, those genes that came into Germany after the collapse of the Roman Empire. The reign of the Roman Empire was the last time in Europe that Greek, Italian, Iberian, Berber, Egyptian, Sarmation, Persian etc people were able to freely move about until the last few centuries due to the Dark Ages and the centuries of unification wars European countries waged AFTER the Dark Ages. (at least in mass numbers that would make a difference in genetic makeup). Germany did not recieve much if any Italian, Greek, Iberian, Egyptian, Berber, Persian etc genes that would be distributed throughout the Roman Empire in all other places.
|
|
|
||||
|
||||
|
05-28-2011, 07:07 AM
Quote:
If you said you were an archaeology major I might have a bit more respect. Nihonshoki/Kojiki is not a historical document in the sense that what is written in it is not considered to be factual accounts of events that preceded it. Not to mention that Chinese records mentioning Japan didn't appear untill well after the Yayoi had been established and there is no mention of major hostilities between Yayoi and Jomon peoples. In the first mention of Japan in Chinese records (centuries after the Yayoi had established themselves), Japan is referred to as a land of 100 kingdoms. In fact Chinese records seem to suggest that the Yayoi fought amongst themselves. The stuff about Baekje and the Japanese government being involved in some big historical cover up?.. well it's irrelevant really and a completely seperate topic. Furthermore, as I mentioned earlier, archaeology is the discipline in which the most information on the era is relevant. And as I said before.. there is no evidence of major hostilities between the Yayoi and Jomon.
|
|
|
||||
|
||||
|
05-28-2011, 07:23 AM
Quote:
|
 |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Copyright 2003-2006 Virtual Japan.
