Originally Posted by XrachelleX (Post 507915)

well, as i am assured you know, that our country likes to do everything by its rules[sometimes]. and if those rules are ever broken, then there will be severe consequenses, in some cases. now if we had a muslim tie, that could go both ways. they could just be friendly with and leave us alone, or they can be freindly and stab us all in the back by an invasioon by any means thought of. .

Originally Posted by MMM (Post 505613)

Interesting. McCain said he wouldn't mind occupying Iraq for another 50 or 100 years, where Obama said he would start pulling troops out of Iraq soon after entering office.

McCain claims Hamas and other terrorist groups support Obama, so why would we be attacked if he is elected?

Israel's PM met with President Bush today in Washington D.C. They have a lot to talk about. What is wrong with Obama meeting with the PM of Israel?

I thought this war was started when the first President Bush didn't oust Saddam Hussein...but it's all perspective, right?

Originally Posted by SSJup81 (Post 507935)

I'd vote for Obama. I agree with his non-violent, ethical views, for the most part.How, when McCain is intent to keep the troops there? He said as much. If he's so intent on us fighting in a war, he should go there himself. Seriously, why are we still in Iraq?

Originally Posted by Nathan (Post 507937)

I did read the thread. I know he's Christian. However:



I am well aware both candidates are of the Christian faith. But the concept of a Islamic candidate is as hypothetical as this statement you just made.

Originally Posted by XrachelleX (Post 507942)

why? becuase if you keep your enemy on the run, they cant plan any attacks. and if there is no plan to follow, then you just have to sit it out until the right time to blast them to peices. get what im saying?

Originally Posted by JapanMan2 (Post 507033)

Very true, and I actually like GW, not as a president but I just think he is a confused guy, who is actually probably a nice guy

Originally Posted by EveV (Post 507951)

If you keep your enemy on the run they get more angry.
Then you, the corrupted, get blast to pieces.
Instead of those innocent women and children that your government killed to fill their disgusting power hungry stomachs.

America is not the almighty powerful.
Or the great safe.
If we continue with these sort of methods it'll defiantly come back to us.
.

Originally Posted by EveV (Post 507951)

If you keep your enemy on the run they get more angry.
Then you, the corrupted, get blast to pieces.
Instead of those innocent women and children that your government killed to fill their disgusting power hungry stomachs.

America is not the almighty powerful.
Or the great safe.
If we continue with these sort of methods it'll defiantly come back to us.

Maybe Obama's attempts to make peace will fail but we don't have much to lose.

Originally Posted by XrachelleX (Post 507956)

i partcailly disagree with your first statement.have you ever tryed planning a party without your extremely strict parents knowing? [[[i know this is a bad example, but bear with me please]]]if you keep your parents occupied with something different, then you can get the job done. in our sense, if they want to live, then they run. they dont, they all get blasted.

Originally Posted by EveV (Post 507958)

And that's okay?
It's okay to blast people to " keep them in line"
That's just sick to think.


I don't just care about my country I care about the world.