JapanForum.com

JapanForum.com (https://www.japanforum.com/forum/)
-   General Discussion (https://www.japanforum.com/forum/general-discussion/)
-   -   What's wrong with Americans? (https://www.japanforum.com/forum/general-discussion/24517-whats-wrong-americans.html)

Ronin4hire 04-17-2009 01:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sangetsu (Post 699131)
I don't get Fox News in Japan.

Fundamentalist Muslims have no country, they live everywhere. They have killed in the usual places, like Afghanistan, Iraq, and Pakistan, but they have also killed in India, Indonesia, Sudan, Kenya, Russia, the Philippines, Sudan, Spain, England, and the US. They would killed in other places as well, and they would kill many more if they had the means.

Is Iran's Jewish community really thriving? They are considered "Dhimmies", and enjoy no civil rights. They are not allowed to build new synagogues, they are not allowed to vote. They are not allowed to speak, pray, or hold hands in public. They are outsiders and serfs, and are only allowed to exist if they accept these conditions and pay a heavy tax to the government. The penalty for disobeying any of these prohibitions is death. They are not thriving, they are merely enduring, as they always have.

Fair enough... I was mistaken about the Iranian Jews.

BUT how does any of that counter what I said? I don't disagree that fundamentalist Muslims have no country... what does that have to do with what I said?

You said the West was at war with Islam because....

Quote:

Significant parts of Islam are at war with the West, and though the west may deny they are at war with Islam, well, it takes 2 to tango, doesn't it? The war in Afghanistan is against the Taliban, who are fundamentalist Muslims. We may say that we are fighting against extremist individuals, but we are also fighting against the belief system that drives their actions.
Now the part I bolded...

I'll say it again. You could use the same logic that you used here to justify saying that the West is at war with Islam to say that the West is at war with Christianity too.

Now does that make sense to you?

minimin 04-17-2009 01:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sangetsu (Post 699134)
Is torture not okay? Exactly what do you define as torture? Waterboarding? Being kept awake for days? Being forced to listen to Britney Spears or Boy George for hours on end? All of these methods are used, and though they are unpleasant, none leave scars, or are life threatening. As a matter of fact, many US soldiers must endure these "tortures" in training, and other methods which are worse. Air Force survival instructors often have their fingernails pulled out in simulated torture, and this is just in training. It hurts, to be sure, but it doesn't kill or cripple.

No,(but other forms of torture used--slapping hitting on the stomach, but not to cause internal bleeding of course, also slamming heads and bodies into walls) its not just because its only PAINFUL, doesn’t mean it should be regarded of good or fun or any less lawless, or anyless unconstitutional. Its still a crime and and I believe breaks atleast four treaties if I am correct. Just because, we should prep for situations like this doesn’t make it anymore right. Shouldn’t we have some scruples. Just because it doesnt kill doesnt mean that its okay.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Sangetsu (Post 699134)
Saddam was not shy about torture. He didn't mind having someone stand on the edge of a tall building and threaten to push them off if they didn't talk, and he tended to push, whether he got the information or not. He also liked to use things like sulfuric acid, electrical shocks, and even a large wood chipper which he used to shred his victims with. The lucky ones were fed into the machine head-first. The unlucky ones went in feet-first.

Two wrongs don’t make it right(plus they werent torturing US in the first place). We invaded a country took down the leader and tortured people. How correct is that and why do we have to meddle in the affairs of another country regardless of how evil the dictator is. North Korea has a pretty mean dictator does that mean we invade for no reason other than wanting to??(make every nation just like ours, we cant make every nation a democracy because we want it to be that way) Now why Bush go to Iran instead where the real problem was?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sangetsu (Post 699134)
Obama couldn't prosecute, even if he wanted to. If he said he did, it was just political rhetoric. If Bush wrote down his intentions about interrogations, and said that they were okay, then they are. The war on terror was authorized by congress, giving the president the ability to make "findings", and these "findings" become law, which makes actions committed in their name legal. Congress can change or reverse these findings/laws later on, but the president would still be immune from prosecution, if you know anything about the article of ex post facto.

As said does that make Bush's actions okay or does that make him and Cheney a war criminal themselves. regardless of what an article says...that i will look at later. but still, Just because the president does it doesnt make it legal, does he have the right to kill under this article.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Sangetsu (Post 699134)
If Obama had decided to prosecute, he would never have succeeded, and, on the slim chance he did, he would have opened the door against future prosecutions against himself if he were take similar actions himself (which may be likely), not to mention reducing the ability of future presidents to make quick decisions in a crisis without having to call a special session of congress.

How would prosecuting torture hinder the presidents actions to make quick decisions in a crisis, so long as he doesnt use torture.

Regardless of whats been done in the past torture isnt okay by any standards, or for anyone. Its my opinion and aint gonna change anytime soon. hmmm...depressing world we live in these days...

alanX 04-17-2009 01:57 AM

Why did this thread get turned into a thread about war? Please get B.O.T.

Nyororin 04-17-2009 03:18 AM

I am going to second AlanX`s sentiment here.
This topic is not about the war, or about US military activity.

Don`t give me a reason to close the thread.

skitty 04-17-2009 04:02 AM

What?
 
Americans are just whats left in the bowl after baking a cake,it's not good but at the same time it's not bad it's just there to use or throw out
but don't hate americans or you'll become the thing you hate IT'S JUST HUMAN NATURE.

MMM 04-17-2009 04:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skitty (Post 699211)
Americans are just whats left in the bowl after baking a cake,it's not good but at the same time it's not bad it's just there to use or throw out
but don't hate americans or you'll become the thing you hate IT'S JUST HUMAN NATURE.

Americans are cake batter? I don't get this at all.

Jaydelart 04-17-2009 04:15 AM

Russia, Australia, Mexico, France, Japan, Iran, Kenya -- you name it... People from virtually all parts of the world live in America, and many of them are proud of it. By saying you hate Americans, you're not only offending "White" people; you're also offending the people of different races and cultures that create modern America; you're potentially saying you hate the world. Maybe that sounds too simplistic...

Hating the American government is a different story, however.

alanX 04-17-2009 05:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jaydelart (Post 699216)
Russia, Australia, Mexico, France, Japan, Iran, Kenya -- you name it... People from virtually all parts of the world live in America, and many of them are proud of it. By saying you hate Americans, you're not only offending "White" people; you're also offending the people of different races and cultures that create modern America; you're potentially saying you hate the world. Maybe that sounds too simplistic...

Hating the American government is a different story, however.

That's giving it a little too much thought, and going a little bit too far. That's like:

X: I hate chocolate
Y: Oh that must mean you must hate milk because milk is in chocolate

No, X doesn't hate milk, he just hates chocolate. Get a clue


Sangetsu 04-17-2009 07:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by minimin (Post 699161)
No,(but other forms of torture used--slapping hitting on the stomach, but not to cause internal bleeding of course, also slamming heads and bodies into walls) its not just because its only PAINFUL, doesn’t mean it should be regarded of good or fun or any less lawless, or anyless unconstitutional. Its still a crime and and I believe breaks atleast four treaties if I am correct. Just because, we should prep for situations like this doesn’t make it anymore right. Shouldn’t we have some scruples. Just because it doesnt kill doesnt mean that its okay.

>If you think these things are painful, you are right. But if these people were free, and had you in their hands, you would suffer far worse. Quote which part of the Constitution these practices violate (and remember that the US Constitution only applies to Americans under American authority), and name even one of the treaties which were violated. Remember that the Geneva and Hague conventions only apply to uniformed soldiers, and not to spies, terrorists, or others.

Two wrongs don’t make it right(plus they werent torturing US in the first place). We invaded a country took down the leader and tortured people. How correct is that and why do we have to meddle in the affairs of another country regardless of how evil the dictator is. North Korea has a pretty mean dictator does that mean we invade for no reason other than wanting to??(make every nation just like ours, we cant make every nation a democracy because we want it to be that way) Now why Bush go to Iran instead where the real problem was?

>No, two wrongs don't make a right, and I agree that going to Iraq was a mistake. But the reasons for going are now moot, and became so as soon as the first bombs were dropped. The past can't be undone, the only thing that can be done is to make the best of situations as they arise now and in the future.

As said does that make Bush's actions okay or does that make him and Cheney a war criminal themselves. regardless of what an article says...that i will look at later. but still, Just because the president does it doesnt make it legal, does he have the right to kill under this article.

>But it does. A presidential finding is law, the president has such powers in matters of national security. Lincoln used it to imprison 70,000 American citizens during the war without ever charging them with a crime. If the president says it is legal, then it is, and actions committed in the definition are not crimes, and therefore, under US law, Neither Cheney, Bush, nor those who they ordered can be described or charged as war criminals. Other countries might take a different view, and if they decide that Bush, et al were war criminals by the definition of their own laws and treaties, then that is their right.

How would prosecuting torture hinder the presidents actions to make quick decisions in a crisis, so long as he doesnt use torture.

>Because "torture" is useful. If it weren't, why would anyone bother to do it? If you read the reports you have been reading about the subject more carefully, you'll notice that even they say that useful information was gained that prevented attacks and saved lives. But, to some people, I guess the lives of the innocent are less important than the comfort of a captured terrorist.

Regardless of whats been done in the past torture isnt okay by any standards, or for anyone. Its my opinion and aint gonna change anytime soon. hmmm...depressing world we live in these days...

>I never said it was okay, but some things which are not okay are sometimes necessary. What happens if the government captures a terrorist who is part of a plot to blow up your neighborhood? One who knows where the bombs will be put, and the names of the people who will put them there. Should the government just ask nicely and hope he'll tell them what he knows? A tough question, isn't it?


mmmmmmmmmm

MMM 04-17-2009 08:11 AM

At the same time I was frustrated with the...simplicity...some people approach issues on this thread, I found a very interesting experiment done by someone in New York City.

I have only been to New York City one time. I am from the Pacific Northwest, and the lifestyle is a bit different in Portland, Oregon compared to New York City, NY.

In this experiment the researcher sent little robots out onto the street with flags designating their intended destination. Much to the researcher's surprise and pleasure, people helped the tiny robots get to their "destination".

Every time the robot got caught under a park bench, ground futilely against a curb, or became trapped in a pothole, some passerby would always rescue it and send it toward its goal. Never once was a Tweenbot lost or damaged.

If you think Americans are nothing but arrogant war-monging fatties, maybe this link will give you a tiny slice of another perspective.

TWEENBOTS



Would people in your hometown help a random robot find its way?
Would they?

minimin 04-17-2009 08:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sangetsu (Post 699255)
mmmmmmmmmm

Quote:

On June 28, 2004, George Bush commemorated the U.N. Day to Support Torture Victims and vowed that the U.S. "will investigate and prosecute all acts of torture and undertake to prevent other cruel and unusual punishment in all territory under our jurisdiction." In doing so, he specifically cited the U.S.'s binding obligation under the Convention to do so (h/t leftydem):

To help fulfill this commitment, the United States has joined 135 other nations in ratifying the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. America stands against and will not tolerate torture. We will investigate and prosecute all acts of torture and undertake to prevent other cruel and unusual punishment in all territory under our jurisdiction. American personnel are required to comply with all U.S. laws, including the United States Constitution, Federal statutes, including statutes prohibiting torture, and our treaty obligations with respect to the treatment of all detainees. . . .

The United States also remains steadfastly committed to upholding the Geneva Conventions, which have been the bedrock of protection in armed conflict for more than 50 years. . . . [W]e will not compromise the rule of law or the values and principles that make us strong. Torture is wrong no matter where it occurs, and the United States will continue to lead the fight to eliminate it everywhere.


If George Bush, citing our obligations under the Convention Against Torture and the Geneva Conventions, can publicly vow that "we will investigate and prosecute all acts of torture."
if this doesnt fulfill your needs I surely can't help you there.

and to your question about the bomb crap, if someone doesn't want to give information, torture wont make them they'll simply suffer(and if they give in and say they did it, they did it so the pain would stop). Sure it has happened before. but I dont think talking here will change a damn thing, as said before internet arguing is so ridiculous so Im done bye-bye. :ywave:

skitty 04-17-2009 08:50 AM

So you're saying that in the biggest melting pot in the states where the so called bad part of our society is high that many ppl showed the same characteristics (or human s showing human nature) towards the aimless wandering robots.wile alot more stood along side and watched or ignored the robots (or human s showing human nature)that even tough we are all together some of us aren't good and some of us aren't bad. or something eles intirely.

noodle 04-17-2009 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sangetsu (Post 699131)
Is Iran's Jewish community really thriving? They are considered "Dhimmies", and enjoy no civil rights. They are not allowed to build new synagogues, they are not allowed to vote. They are not allowed to speak, pray, or hold hands in public. They are outsiders and serfs, and are only allowed to exist if they accept these conditions and pay a heavy tax to the government. The penalty for disobeying any of these prohibitions is death. They are not thriving, they are merely enduring, as they always have.

Dude, that is just ridiculous!!! I know this isnt the thread for it, and we're not supposed to speak about it, but what you just wrote here is a joke!

Having read a lot about Iran and Iraq, I can safely tell you that since the Islamic revolution and the Khomeini protection in Iran, Tehran has 11 functioning synagogues, many of them having Hebrew schools. There is a Jewish hospital, an old-age home and a cemetery. There is a Jewish representative in the Iranian parliament. There is a Jewish library with 20,000 titles. All of this for a comunity of around 25,000 in the country!

As for the last part, "always have", when did always start for you? People seem to forget that the middle east was a peaceful place for centuries until the west (English and French mainly) came and disturbed the peace. In Iraq, Muslims, Christians and Jews lived happily together for centuries.

solemnclockwork 04-17-2009 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by noodle (Post 699274)
Dude, that is just ridiculous!!! I know this isnt the thread for it, and we're not supposed to speak about it, but what you just wrote here is a joke!

Having read a lot about Iran and Iraq, I can safely tell you that since the Islamic revolution and the Khomeini protection in Iran, Tehran has 11 functioning synagogues, many of them having Hebrew schools. There is a Jewish hospital, an old-age home and a cemetery. There is a Jewish representative in the Iranian parliament. There is a Jewish library with 20,000 titles. All of this for a comunity of around 25,000 in the country!

As for the last part, "always have", when did always start for you? People seem to forget that the middle east was a peaceful place for centuries until the west (English and French mainly) came and disturbed the peace. In Iraq, Muslims, Christians and Jews lived happily together for centuries.

The Jews suffer from official inferior status under Iranian Law and are not protected by police or the courts. The amount of financial compensation a Jew can receive from a Muslim in case of murder or accidental death of a relative is equal to one-eighth of that which would be paid if the victim was a Muslim.

In practice this means that a life of a Jew in Iran has very little value. In addition, since Iranian courts routinely refuse to accept the testimony of a Jew against a Muslim, most cases of this sort are not even prosecuted and the police do not even investigate such claims. As a result of their legally inferior status, Jews find themselves outside the protection of the courts and police. This is not simply a perception on their part, but rather, sadly, a harsh reality. In none of the cases of the murder of Jews in Iran has a perpetrator ever been found, much less prosecuted.

Jews are excluded from most government positions. Virtually all government entities (most sectors in Iran are government-owned) have a "Muslim only" policy and they print this requirement in their job notices in newspapers. This formal exclusion of Jews from large areas of employment is badly damaging to the Jews.

Most private companies, thanks to the anti-Semitic media campaign in Iran, do not hire Jews either. Most Jews are forced into self-employment, but due to general public prejudice, few buy anything from them. The US State Department Religious Freedom Report of 2001 confirms that Jewish businesses have been targets of vandalism and boycotts.

However, the most widely publicized example of the Islamic Regime views on the Holocaust came again from Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Khamenei, who in March 2001, denied the Holocaust and called the survivors of the death camps "a bunch of hooligans who emigrated to Palestine."

Iran has also become the world headquarters for the publication of a constant stream of European and American revisionist historians who have denied the existence of the Holocaust. Primary among these are the works of Roger Garaudy, a French revisionist to Shia Islam. Garaudy's books have been widely translated and distributed in Iran, in part not by the fundamentalists, but rather by the so-called reform circles.

While the Islamic Republic does not guarantee the right of free speech and protest to any of its citizens, the situation, because of the Islamic Law, is considerably worse for the Jews. If an Iranian Muslim criticizes the Islamic Republic, he himself can be punished; if a Jew does it, under the laws of the Islamic Republic his actions may legally affect the well being of the entire Jewish community.

Do I have to say anymore about Iran?

noodle 04-17-2009 09:05 AM

Do you mind giving me the source of this article? Because I can easily go find an article that is of the exact oposite of what you just pasted!:)

Like, I can easily paste this! And come to the conclusion that Jews that have left Iran are overly negative about the country, whereas the Jews left in Iran arn't particularly upset or whatever!

Testimony from Jews who have left Iran suggests more serious problems than those cited by Jews inside the country. In written testimony to a congressional subcommittee in February 1996, an Iranian Jew complained of being imprisoned for two years on trumped-up charges of spying for Israel. He also said his arrest was preceded by harassment at work and pressure to convert to Islam. Inside Iran, Jews say that they frequently receive alarmed telephone calls and letters from relatives in the United States concerned about their well-being, but that they themselves do not feel physically endangered. Their major complaint is the inability to visit family in Israel, and what they say is inadequate funding for Hebrew schools, which are administered by the Iranian Ministry of Education.

''Everywhere in the world there are people who don't like Jews. In England, they draw swastikas on Jewish graves. I don't think that Iran is more dangerous for Jews than other places.''

solemnclockwork 04-17-2009 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by noodle (Post 699281)
Do you mind giving me the source of this article? Because I can easily go find an article that is of the exact oposite of what you just pasted!:)

Like, I can easily paste this! And come to the conclusion that Jews that have left Iran are overly negative about the country, whereas the Jews left in Iran arn't particularly upset or whatever!

Testimony from Jews who have left Iran suggests more serious problems than those cited by Jews inside the country. In written testimony to a congressional subcommittee in February 1996, an Iranian Jew complained of being imprisoned for two years on trumped-up charges of spying for Israel. He also said his arrest was preceded by harassment at work and pressure to convert to Islam. Inside Iran, Jews say that they frequently receive alarmed telephone calls and letters from relatives in the United States concerned about their well-being, but that they themselves do not feel physically endangered. Their major complaint is the inability to visit family in Israel, and what they say is inadequate funding for Hebrew schools, which are administered by the Iranian Ministry of Education.

''Everywhere in the world there are people who don't like Jews. In England, they draw swastikas on Jewish graves. I don't think that Iran is more dangerous for Jews than other places.''

Do you honestly think that Jews would be ok in an country that the leaders want to wipe Israel of the map, and continuous supports Terrorism to kill Jews and also supports t.v. shows calling them pigs? That potentially seeks an Nuclear bomb to destroy Israel. You seriously find nothing wrong with that? I can't give you an copy paste as that information comes from memory but I will point you to articles that back up what I"m saying (oh by the way a LOT of that was reported in the news so it should be common nowledge.)

there's a difference in having the people put demeaning marks on a grave and having the government do it.

Religious minorities were barred from election to a representative body, except for the five Majles seats reserved for recognized religious minorities (two for the Armenian Christians, and one each for the Assyrian Christians, Jews and Zoroastrians), and from holding senior government or military positions, but they were allowed to vote. Although the constitution mandates an Islamic army, members of religious minorities served in the military, although non-Muslim promotions were limited by a military restriction against non-Muslims commanding Muslims. Reportedly non-Muslims can be officers during their mandatory military service but cannot be career military officers.

The legal system previously discriminated against recognized religious minorities in relation to blood money; however, in 2004 the Expediency Council authorized collection of equal blood money for the death of Muslim and non-Muslim men. All women and Baha'i and Sabean-Mandean men remained excluded from the revised ruling. According to the law, Baha'i blood is considered mobah, meaning it can be spilled with impunity.

Inheritance laws favored Muslim family members over non-Muslims. For example, under existing inheritance laws, if a non-Muslim converted to Islam, that person would inherit all family holdings while non-Muslim relatives would receive nothing.

Proselytizing of Muslims by non-Muslims was illegal. The government did not ensure the right of citizens to change or recant their religion. Apostasy, specifically conversion from Islam, was punishable by death, although there were no reported instances of the death penalty being applied for apostasy during the year.

In December 2006 the government sponsored a conference entitled, "Review of the Holocaust: Global Vision." This conference was widely criticized as it sought to provide a forum for those who deny the existence or scope of the Holocaust. Speakers at the conference universally called for the elimination or delegitimization of the state of Israel and alleged that the Holocaust did not occur or was an exaggeration used by Jews for political and financial gains. The conference was followed by the establishment of the World Foundation for Holocaust Studies, run by a committee of Holocaust deniers.

In May 2006 a local magazine published photos of synagogues draped in U.S. and Israeli flags and claimed they were in Tehran and Shiraz when in fact they were outside of the country. Anti-Jewish and anti-Israel demonstrations followed in Shiraz. The Jewish MP protested in the Majles and was supported by the Speaker of the Majles, Gholam Ali Hadded Adel, who reprimanded the magazine.

Taken from Iran

Jaydelart 04-17-2009 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alanX (Post 699227)
That's giving it a little too much thought, and going a little bit too far. That's like:

X: I hate chocolate
Y: Oh that must mean you must hate milk because milk is in chocolate

No, X doesn't hate milk, he just hates chocolate. Get a clue

I wish I had a clue.

You're right.... but only to a certain extent.
Hating milk (The World) can act as the foundation for hating chocolate (America) because they are closely related. Though, I'm not sure comparing America to chocolate and The World to milk is an accurate analogy -- assuming you were aiming to be accurate. Modern day America comprises significantly of foreign people and cultures; You can't have modern day America without having foreign cultures ~ While you can have chocolate without milk.

America is largely diverse. Name any country in the world and I can almost guarantee you there are people from that country that live in - or better yet: migrated to - America. So, when a person says they hate Americans, who, exactly, are they referring to?

noodle 04-17-2009 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by solemnclockwork (Post 699291)
Do you honestly think that Jews would be ok in an country that the leaders want to wipe Israel of the map, and continuous supports Terrorism to kill Jews and also supports t.v. shows calling them pigs? That potentially seeks an Nuclear bomb to destroy Israel. You seriously find nothing wrong with that? I can't give you an copy paste as that information comes from memory but I will point you to articles that back up what I"m saying (oh by the way a LOT of that was reported in the news so it should be common nowledge.)

there's a difference in having the people put demeaning marks on a grave and having the government do it.

What are you trying to say exactly? There ARE Jewish people in THAT country :confused: As for the not remembering where you got the copy and paste thing, lol, please. No offense to your English, but the level of English between your posts and what you posted is totally different!

As for the marks on the grave thing, that was a QUOTE from a Jew in Iran!


I'm gonna step back from this convo for two reasons... This isn't the thread for it, and secondly, it will just turn into another "Western Media Conspiracy" kind of discussion!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jaydelart (Post 699313)
America is largely diverse. Name any country in the world and I can almost guarantee you there are people from that country that live in - or better yet: migrated to - America. So, when a person says they hate Americans, who, exactly, are they referring to?

I don't think those people are actually talking about ethnicity! It's about nationality. For example, I am Berber, Algerian, but now I have British Nationality, and I am very proud to be British! In a debate against Algerians, if I believe the Algerian is wrong, I am proud to defend Britain!

tifa 04-17-2009 05:23 PM

sucks, why hate it and still live there why act all...mean soooo funny...main though, when i get out of america im going japan! ..uhuh..*walks away*

alanX 04-17-2009 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tifa (Post 699398)
sucks, why hate it and still live there why act all...mean soooo funny...main though, when i get out of america im going japan! ..uhuh..*walks away*

How? .

Daydreamer 04-17-2009 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by XOXkAWAIiXOX (Post 698494)
Sorry if there is already a thread for this.

I don't like America very much, but it is my homeland and I get very offended when someone says that Americans are lazy and stupid. Not all Americans are like that. I am not lazy and I'm actually very smart. I study in and out of school. What's up with all these stereotypes against Americans?? I hear it all the time and most of it isn't completely true! Please inform. Arigato.

A lot of americans are very lazy and stupid.. im also not like that but im Mexican and i have american friends that r so smart and actiave in school and at their house... it is just how ppl look at things.. there is always going to be steriotyping about not just american but for anyone who is a person living in this world, that is what shows when ppl are so imature and need a life..lol

alanX 04-17-2009 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daydreamer (Post 699402)
A lot of americans are very lazy and stupid..


Quote:

Originally Posted by Daydreamer (Post 699402)
im Mexican






tifa 04-17-2009 05:33 PM

lol...man jf sucks people getting anal and topics getting random

Daydreamer 04-17-2009 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alanX (Post 699404)

wow, what does this mean??? lol

MMM 04-17-2009 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skitty (Post 699273)
So you're saying that in the biggest melting pot in the states where the so called bad part of our society is high that many ppl showed the same characteristics (or human s showing human nature) towards the aimless wandering robots.wile alot more stood along side and watched or ignored the robots (or human s showing human nature)that even tough we are all together some of us aren't good and some of us aren't bad. or something eles intirely.

You didn't understand that at all. The point is that in the biggest city in the US and people are still not so busy, in such a hurry, so arrogant or self-important that they cannot help tiny toy robots to their destinations.

Quote:

Originally Posted by tifa (Post 699398)
sucks, why hate it and still live there why act all...mean soooo funny...main though, when i get out of america im going japan! ..uhuh..*walks away*

I thought you lived in London.

skitty 04-17-2009 07:17 PM

but that was only a small percent of the big picture! if he did this for ten years with documentation , videos of the some people who help the robots.instead stating that sum us of helped and sum of us didn't then i wouldve understood his social experiment FULLY but he just proved that americans arent bad but there not good either he got idea across some helped some didnt, not that all americans are good in thier own way
(hint)sum good ,I know that not all who didnt help aren't bad they were confused or just didnt care. but he didnt do it to prove that either just proved that most of all americans are to stupid realize that something so innocent can be extremely deadly you should know youre into robots.

MMM 04-17-2009 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skitty (Post 699455)
but that was only a small percent of the big picture! if he did this for ten years with documentation , videos of the some people who help the robots.instead stating that sum us of helped and sum of us didn't then i wouldve understood his social experiment FULLY but he just proved that americans arent bad but there not good either he got idea across some helped some didnt, not that all americans are good in thier own way
(hint)sum good ,I know that not all who didnt help aren't bad they were confused or just didnt care. but he didnt do it to prove that either just proved that most of all americans are to stupid realize that something so innocent can be extremely deadly you should know youre into robots.

I am amazed at how cynical a human being could be, and am hoping you are confused or didn't read the article. (It's short. Might take two minutes)

TWEENBOTS

Basically the writer took "robots" (toys, really) attached with post card that wrote their intended final destination. The robots are not radio-controlled. They only go in straight lines. So it would take the help of New Yorkers to get the robots to where they need to go. Sounds like an easy way to lose some toys, right.

No, in every case, the robots made their way from the helpful assistance of the seemingly busy and "arrogant" Americans living in New York.

Naturally not EVERY single person who saw the robot helped them, but enough did that not a single robot didn't complete it's mission. The robots were not screaming for help, but just puttering down the sidewalk.



With the help of 29 different individuals one robot made it across Washington Square Park.



There were no TV cameras and no rewards, just unrelated people turning a little toy in the right direction.

Your mistake, skitty, is making the leap in logic that those that didn't help the robots were "bad". How you come up with the logic of your last line makes me want to buy you a one way ticket out of America and see if you can find your way back.

alanX 04-17-2009 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MMM (Post 699459)
I am amazed at how cynical a human being could be, and am hoping you are confused or didn't read the article. (It's short. Might take two minutes)

Some people just aren't worth the time, MMM

What a day...

tifa 04-17-2009 07:56 PM

i do live in london but im just telling u what most kids probally think " i hate my country ah i wanna live in japan" ehh ehhhh

MMM 04-17-2009 08:05 PM

Your words, Tifa. That's all you have to communicate with.

Aniki 04-17-2009 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MMM (Post 699459)
Basically the writer took "robots" (toys, really) attached with post card that wrote their intended final destination. The robots are not radio-controlled. They only go in straight lines. So it would take the help of New Yorkers to get the robots to where they need to go. Sounds like an easy way to lose some toys, right.

No, in every case, the robots made their way from the helpful assistance of the seemingly busy and "arrogant" Americans living in New York.

Naturally not EVERY single person who saw the robot helped them, but enough did that not a single robot didn't complete it's mission. The robots were not screaming for help, but just puttering down the sidewalk.



I don't understand what you're trying to prove here MMM. The experiment was done in a park in which out, like what, 100 or maybe more people 29 helped a robot to get to destination.

So what does that mean, that not all New Yorker's are busy "arrogant" people? What?

AnthraxAttack 04-17-2009 08:30 PM

When the world sees an american that sticks out like a sore thumb, we take a sledgehammer to bash him in line with the others. The only problem is that we bash a lot more than intended.

Sinestra 04-17-2009 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alanX (Post 699461)
Some people just aren't worth the time, MMM

What a day...

I think this might be the best thing iv read around here in months.

solemnclockwork 04-17-2009 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by noodle (Post 699325)
What are you trying to say exactly? There ARE Jewish people in THAT country :confused: As for the not remembering where you got the copy and paste thing, lol, please. No offense to your English, but the level of English between your posts and what you posted is totally different!

As for the marks on the grave thing, that was a QUOTE from a Jew in Iran!


I'm gonna step back from this convo for two reasons... This isn't the thread for it, and secondly, it will just turn into another "Western Media Conspiracy" kind of discussion!



I don't think those people are actually talking about ethnicity! It's about nationality. For example, I am Berber, Algerian, but now I have British Nationality, and I am very proud to be British! In a debate against Algerians, if I believe the Algerian is wrong, I am proud to defend Britain!

Why don't you take a break and try to argue your point instead of insulting someone. I posted facts and information obtain, many of it has been thrown around over the news channels over the years. You want to argue the point post your information that says Iran is nice to Jews.

What I'm trying to say is THEY DO NOT SEE JEWS ON THE SAME LEVEL AS A PERSON, why can't you get that? Does that fact that they support Hasbala, want to destroy the Israel nation, and call them pigs not sound alarming to you? To add to that they NEVER DID get along with Jews. I do think it's common knowledge of the wedge between Jews and Muslims. The quote should be alarming enough if it came from Iran, but my point was lost about it.

Last point I"m going to make, I don't care for what you want to call it, but please provide information on how nice Iran is to Jews, I mean when you can't even hold an government position because of your religion, that necessarily don't qualify you for nice person of the year. Also I don't care for the "western media conspiracy crap" seriously you don't have proof of it, why even bring it up?

MMM 04-17-2009 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aniki (Post 699470)
I don't understand what you're trying to prove here MMM. The experiment was done in a park in which out, like what, 100 or maybe more people 29 helped a robot to get to destination.

So what does that mean, that not all New Yorker's are busy "arrogant" people? What?

I am not trying to prove anything.

However, if you read that link and get "Out of a huge park full of people ONLY 29 people helped the tiny robot get to its destination" I think your psychiatrist needs to put you on anti-depressants. Or at least ease off the emo a bit. It's making you very negative and cynical.

Ask yourself: what is this a picture of?


Aniki 04-17-2009 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MMM (Post 699505)
I am not trying to prove anything.
However, if you read that link and get "Out of a huge park full of people ONLY 29 people helped the tiny robot get to its destination" I think your psychiatrist needs to put you on anti-depressants. Or at least ease off the emo a bit. It's making you very negative and cynical.
Ask yourself: what is this a picture of?

I just wanted to get a clearer picture of the whole robot thing in this thread and I get insulted? Not to mention that I haven't made any statement on this whole subject and I'm already called negative and cynical.
Think you're the who needs to see a psychiatrist, 'cause there are many BAD thoughts are squishing that brain of yours.

MMM 04-17-2009 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aniki (Post 699525)
I just wanted to get a clearer picture of the whole robot thing in this thread and I get insulted? Not to mention that I haven't made any statement on this whole subject and I'm already called negative and cynical.
Think you're the who needs to see a psychiatrist, 'cause there are many BAD thoughts are squishing that brain of yours.

I said "If you saw it this way..." I didn't say "Aniki needs to see a psychiatrist". If you didn't see it that way then I wasn't talking to you, Aniki.

I didn't insult you. However if ANYONE read that link and got such a negative reaction from the findings, I think that person needs to get out of the goth waters and get a little sunshine.

Try this for starters: YouTube - Susan Boyle - Singer - Britains Got Talent 2009 (With Lyrics)

Tsuwabuki 04-17-2009 11:19 PM

The question is not what is wrong with Americans, but rather what is wrong with humans.

Nationalist squabbles are absolutely silly at this point in our history. The sooner people recognise this, the better.

SephirothVVC 04-17-2009 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tsuwabuki (Post 699531)
The question is not what is wrong with Americans, but rather what is wrong with humans.

*hi5* well said

XOXkAWAIiXOX 04-17-2009 11:33 PM

Uhh ok... I was gone for one day. Wow. :eek: Umm.... I just wanted to know why I was being stereotyped so much. Jeez...

So, if anyone cares about the children in Uganda(Cenral East Africa) please take a moment to go to therescue.invisiblechildren.com and watch the video. it will break your heart. Please donate and come to the rally(if you're near one) and just show how much you care. I know this is random, but it's importnant.

Also, I haven't spoken a word today! You know why? It's the Day Of Silence! It's basically a protest agaiinst discrimination of gays, lesbians, bisexuals, tranvestites, and pansexuals. :)

I hope y'all participate in the The Rescue and HAPPY DAY OF SILENCE!


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:05 AM.

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6