JapanForum.com

JapanForum.com (https://www.japanforum.com/forum/)
-   General Discussion (https://www.japanforum.com/forum/general-discussion/)
-   -   The Joker Vs. Tony Montana (https://www.japanforum.com/forum/general-discussion/25045-joker-vs-tony-montana.html)

Debi 05-09-2009 04:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Compaqmac321 (Post 712952)
yup
haha notice i dont think any girls commented on this thread either
scarface is just manly aint it?
300 too
idk bout batman
its manly, but its batman so females saw it

Oh but you know about 300, females went nuts over it because of the half-nude dudes and the UFC-like abs of the actors.

Thats another stupid thing about the movie. They forgot to put their armors on....

Debi 05-09-2009 04:04 AM

In overall, I think about my favorite male actors and it's pretty much like this :

Al Pacino (especially for the godfather, scarface and also the devil advocate)
Denzel Washington (man on fire, training day, malcom x, and some more
Leonardo Dicaprio (the departed, blood diamonds )
What else... maybe Tom Hanks

Oh, I really liked Dustin Hoffman in Rainman too.

Compaqmac321 05-09-2009 04:04 AM

haha yea
haha
i think alot of the abs were sprayed on too

MMM 05-09-2009 04:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Debi (Post 712957)
Oh but you know about 300, females went nuts over it because of the half-nude dudes and the UFC-like abs of the actors.

Thats another stupid thing about the movie. They forgot to put their armors on....

300 isn't based on the actual battle as much as it is based on a very stylistic graphic novel giving a fictionalized account of the battle.

Debi 05-09-2009 04:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MMM (Post 712972)
300 isn't based on the actual battle as much as it is based on a very stylistic graphic novel giving a fictionalized account of the battle.

I remember the director of the film saying that the movie was "90 % historically accurate"

I seriously laughed my off.

rison 05-09-2009 04:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MMM (Post 712938)
I haven't heard anyone discuss Pacino's performance in Scarface as something amazing ever before today.

I'll encourage you to start a discussion of Al's performance(26 years ago) among friends and notice their passion then compare it to a Heath's which was just 2 to 3 years.

Debi 05-09-2009 04:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rison (Post 712975)
I'll encourage you to start a discussion of Al's performance(26 years ago) among friends and notice their passion then compare it to a Heath's which was just 2 to 3 years.

The fact Heath died changed the perception of many.

MMM 05-09-2009 04:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rison (Post 712975)
I'll encourage you to start a discussion of Al's performance(26 years ago) among friends and notice their passion then compare it to a Heath's which was just 2 to 3 years.

We all love Al Pacino, don't get me wrong. But Brian De Palma movies are usually overdone bloody massacres, which is fine if you like that. But he isn't an actor's director.
Like you I defended Scarface to the teeth until one friend said "Watch it again". I took him up on his challenge, and felt he was right.

I wonder how many of the staunch defenders of Al Pacino's acting in the film as powerfully moving and challenging have actually seen it in the last couple years.

MMM 05-09-2009 04:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Debi (Post 712977)
The fact Heath died changed the perception of many.

They were talking about Heath's performance and Oscar before he died.

MMM 05-09-2009 04:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Debi (Post 712973)
I remember the director of the film saying that the movie was "90 % historically accurate"

I seriously laughed my off.

You must have been laughing when he went on to say it was more "opera than documentary" and called it a "fantasy film" narrated by a narrator who " who knows how not to wreck a good story with truth."


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:55 PM.

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6