She Resigned not quite and it was cause of the Liberal attack dogs/obama a** licker's who were slandering her and filing false ethics claims which was hurting her state in a effort to silence her dissent of dictator obama

What is a resignation if it isn't quitting?

liberal attack dogs and Obama ***lickers? Where do get this stuff? Palin's been dealing with this stuff since long before she ran for VP and he was elected, so that's not going to fly. And they weren't (and aren't) all left-swinging. Look at Talis Colberg, for one.

You do know of the attacks the McCain campaign put out, after he lost?

Also stop with the baseless attacks on Obama, I certainly don't agree with the policies but calling him a dictator, is baseless.

Really? What a fascinating argument...
Among 12-year-olds.

I don't get it. Do people still think Palin wants a future in a political career (hinting mostly as President, like I've heard suggested)?

Considering she quit to supposedly silence those that are reporting ethics violations against her, those complaints would start up again as soon as she runs/wins another office.

She has already signed a book deal, so my guess is she will "write" a book, do a book tour, do the talk show circuit, and eventually have her own talk show.

As I understand it, she felt that it was unfair of her to stay where she was because of the constant court cases brought against her, many for questionable reasons. It was a drain on the state's budget and was tying up her time, time she felt the state should have recieved. Wether that's true or not doesn't really matter, some will believe her and some wont.

I do suggest that the constant attacks she recives from the press and democrats in general, would indicate that she is feared as a potential power player in the future. Afterall, no one goes after a dead dog, it's the growling one you worry about. Again, how this plays out has yet to be seen fully, time will tell.

Personally, I think she will be down in the lower 48 and go on the attack before next summer.

well first off the so called republicans aka Rinos are attacking Palin cause they are crooks and will do anything to stay in power even eat their own are they are really nothing but liberals/democrats claiming to be conservative republicans. And calling obama a dictator is really tame compared to what liberals called Bush and Cheney. But then obama backs Iranians dictatorship and he also backs abortion on demand as well as funding chinas slaughter of girl babies with us tax payer dollers. George Washington i believe it was once shot a man for betraying the oath of office. The US is a Constitutional Republic where the leaders are supposed to be the servants and the people the masters.

Do they still ware the republican brand, yes they do. McCain in of himself was an moderate Republican so I really don't see how your going to brand his campaign as Liberal democrat. Do you understand what those imply when you write them in context of ideology?

Really? So you want to continue this petty name calling business? IN all aspect BE better then those who want to continue down that slide! In that aspect calling him an dictator is bogus because of the way are government is set up, I don't see anyone taking liberties to destroy that system.

Argue against his policies, and do not resort to petty name calling. I have stated I don't agree with his policies and as such that is an point of debate NOT name calling. You don't agree with whats happening then state it, and go out and campaign against such and such. Voters still have power in this country. Remind the government who they serve.

Palin as she is right now, is an VERY polarizing figure. I could not figure out for the life of me, why she wasn't dropped in the media after the campaign. Usually vice presidents of the losing campaign are forgotten about. In some capacity she might become an influential figure in the republican party or in public view.

mccain is a Liberal who has a C- rating from the NRA who was picked by the liberal media to be the GOP Candidate and did not fight hard enough to win.
Sara Palin who has a A+ rating from the NRA lost cause of the wimpy moderate mccain. Obama backs fairness doctrine aka fascist doctrine ,hate crime laws aka thought crime laws,and gun control if thats not trying to take away liberties i do not know what to call it.

You are sadly mistaken on the lot of that. First off, McCain was almost never hear of in the beginning of the fight for the Republican nomination, to the point that NO media outlet focused on him. Secondly voters of the states CHOOSE there candidate not the media. I will give that the media played an HUGE role in helping there candidate when but, ultimately the voters decide.

Already opposing Obama in ads, NRA formally endorses McCain's presidential bid

Obama does NOT back the fairness doctrine, you just cannot debate it.

Obama makes it clear: No ‘Fairness Doctrine’ | Jay Bookman

The Hate crime bill (the biggest problem of the bill is the language that speech is used to plan, you should be able to guess where that can lead) and gun control laws are in violation of the Constitution. Problem is not necessarily Obama, but the congress. Obama does not, and can not act alone in passing law. Checks and balances is the phrase, that stands how are government is supposed to work. Point here it is trying to take away civil liberties, BUT that is not being an dictator is it? The same could be said of Bush also, and the current trend in our government for the disregard of the basis of the foundation of the USA. Mistaken maybe, socialist policies, yes, dictator just NO.

more lies look up Joyce Foundation and the liberal group VPC
mccain is a Rino no matter what you say and will be booted from the party soon.
if obama did not back the fascist doctrine,thought crime laws and gun control he could publicly state this but obama backs all 3 on the sly. in fact obamas voting record shows he is a enemy of the 2nd. Another thing that mccain letting obama win the election has caused friction between our Ally Israel Obama insists on being Neville chamberlain and backing the Iranian dictators and the fake elections held in iran. Bush is a great leader who did all he could to defend America/Isreal/Japan and Western Civilization. Obama is also refusing to defend our ally Japan but stopping deployment of the missile defense shield and cutting deals with the russian dictatorship. I am sure Military Leaders in japan are concerned about obamas Neville Chamberlain/Jimmy carter ideals of appeasement.

Before anybody jumps down my throat, I'm just putting this out for your discussion I'm not taking any sides in this article.

Investigator rules against Palin in ethics probe - Yahoo! News

Thats because she used a fund to pay for the lawyers to defend against all those other idiot probes that turned up nothing. Really, it's mostly just smoke and mirrors all away around anyway.

As to Obama, it's still a tad early yet to see how his idea's play out. I think historically such notions have proven to be failures, but maybe he can alter that. Personally I doubt it, he suffers what many good willed people suffer, a stange lack of understanding how evil works.

You see it in all the movies about space aliens, who's the first person blown up? The dude that walks up trying to befriend them. Sometimes, they just don't come in peace.