JapanForum.com  


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
(#31 (permalink))
Old
globetrotter36's Avatar
globetrotter36 (Offline)
JF Regular
 
Posts: 39
Join Date: Oct 2007
Send a message via Skype™ to globetrotter36
03-17-2011, 10:58 PM

Nyororin and Termogard; there is substance in what both of you are saying about radiation;

Spent fuel pool - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Time consuming to read and I can't say I understand a lot of information associated with the point being discussed.

Last edited by globetrotter36 : 03-17-2011 at 11:02 PM.
Reply With Quote
(#32 (permalink))
Old
globetrotter36's Avatar
globetrotter36 (Offline)
JF Regular
 
Posts: 39
Join Date: Oct 2007
Send a message via Skype™ to globetrotter36
03-17-2011, 11:04 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prostak View Post
Please allow me to remind you, my friends, that japanese already pased through THE SAME (and possibly- much worse!!!) situation with radioactive disaster after nuclear bombing!
Than you overcame it' : and survived!
Why just now- the such panic!?

A good many were and maybe still are suffering the after effects for years.
Reply With Quote
(#33 (permalink))
Old
termogard's Avatar
termogard (Offline)
JF Old Timer
 
Posts: 597
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ウラジオストク、沿海地方、露西亜
radioation - 03-17-2011, 11:21 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by siokan View Post
Chernobyl
Observed maximum number value
20000 roentgen/hour= about 200000mSievert/hour = 200sV/h

Fukushima
Observed maximum number value
400mSv/h
So what? It was deadly dangerous to be nearby Chernobyl reactor. According to japanese sources, it is deadly dangerous now to be near damaged Fukushima reactors.

People were evacuated from a region of location of Chernobyl Nuclear Power Station and now people are evacuated from a region of Fukushima Nuclear Plant.

Chernobyl reactor had a leak of radiation into atmosphere and nearby environment and Fukushima Daiichi reactors have a leak of radiation into atmosphere.
Reply With Quote
(#34 (permalink))
Old
siokan's Avatar
siokan (Offline)
JF Old Timer
 
Posts: 395
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: solar system,2ch
03-17-2011, 11:40 PM

It is an observation data today
http://ag.riken.jp/u/mon/2011-03-18.gif
Timezone : GMT+9:00
Unit : μSv/h 1000μSv/h=1mSv/h
Station : Tokai, Ibaraki
fukushima-100km-tokai(leeward)-115km-tokyo(leeward)

Tokyo to New York by airplane One way 0.19mSv
Hot spring(onsen) of radium 0.3-15μSv/h
X-ray computed tomography - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Guarapari - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia beach 5-15μSv/h


Please permit poor English. orz
Cryptanalysis is necessary for you.
set a goal:English at the same level as Johan Cruyff
Reply With Quote
(#35 (permalink))
Old
siokan's Avatar
siokan (Offline)
JF Old Timer
 
Posts: 395
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: solar system,2ch
03-17-2011, 11:55 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by termogard View Post
So what? It was deadly dangerous to be nearby Chernobyl reactor. According to japanese sources, it is deadly dangerous now to be near damaged Fukushima reactors.

People were evacuated from a region of location of Chernobyl Nuclear Power Station and now people are evacuated from a region of Fukushima Nuclear Plant.

Chernobyl reactor had a leak of radiation into atmosphere and nearby environment and Fukushima Daiichi reactors have a leak of radiation into atmosphere.
Chernobyl
Contamination by nuclear fission.

Fukushima
Nuclear fission is a suspension settlement.
Contamination by evaporating coolant water.

When it is not possible to understand
Google

If it is an accident similar to Chernobyl, the cooling work cannot be done.
Even if it puts on protective clothing, it is contaminated.


Please permit poor English. orz
Cryptanalysis is necessary for you.
set a goal:English at the same level as Johan Cruyff

Last edited by siokan : 03-18-2011 at 12:04 AM.
Reply With Quote
(#36 (permalink))
Old
termogard's Avatar
termogard (Offline)
JF Old Timer
 
Posts: 597
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ウラジオストク、沿海地方、露西亜
Post contamination - 03-18-2011, 12:02 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by siokan View Post
Chernobyl
Contamination by nuclear fission.

Fukushima
Nuclear fission is a suspension settlement.
Contamination by evaporating coolant water.

When it is not possible to understand
Google
Yes, atmospheric contamination and contamination of nearby environment in both cases.
Reply With Quote
(#37 (permalink))
Old
siokan's Avatar
siokan (Offline)
JF Old Timer
 
Posts: 395
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: solar system,2ch
03-18-2011, 12:24 AM

The person doesn't live naturally in the region where the value of the radioactivity is high............

Yangjiang - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Guarapari - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Kerala - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ramsar, Mazandaran - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

e0086860_1557236[1].jpg


Please permit poor English. orz
Cryptanalysis is necessary for you.
set a goal:English at the same level as Johan Cruyff
Reply With Quote
(#38 (permalink))
Old
termogard's Avatar
termogard (Offline)
JF Old Timer
 
Posts: 597
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ウラジオストク、沿海地方、露西亜
Post possible mutants - 03-18-2011, 02:45 AM

Large example of wels catfish in a technical pond nearby Chernobyl NPP.

Catfish from Chernobyl
Reply With Quote
(#39 (permalink))
Old
Ryzorian (Offline)
Busier Than Shinjuku Station
 
Posts: 1,126
Join Date: Jun 2009
03-18-2011, 03:56 AM

Wels catfish in a lake in Spain weigh 300+ pounds. Those fish can get huge.

The radiation is comeing from a pond that housed spent fule rods. The primary reactor is full of sea water, it's the spent fuel rod pond they are worried about...Depleted uranium. Sure it's going to leak radiation but not in the massive quantities people are all worrying about. You would prolly take more rads from 10 mins in a sun tan bed than what you will recieve in Tokyo, let alone farther away.
Reply With Quote
(#40 (permalink))
Old
GoNative (Offline)
Busier Than Shinjuku Station
 
Posts: 1,063
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Inverloch, Australia
03-18-2011, 05:05 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by termogard View Post
So what? It was deadly dangerous to be nearby Chernobyl reactor. According to japanese sources, it is deadly dangerous now to be near damaged Fukushima reactors.

People were evacuated from a region of location of Chernobyl Nuclear Power Station and now people are evacuated from a region of Fukushima Nuclear Plant.

Chernobyl reactor had a leak of radiation into atmosphere and nearby environment and Fukushima Daiichi reactors have a leak of radiation into atmosphere.
You really seemed determined to try and make out what has happened here is worse than it is. The events in Fukushima are nothing like what occurred at Chernobyl. Not even close. Siokan makes some excellent points which you just completely ignore on your little crusade.
Firstly the Chernobyl reactor blew when it was running near full power. It had not shut down and had control rods inserted into the core to greatly reduce the nuclear reactions. The core was completely and utterly exposed and radioactive material was blasted many km's up into the atmosphere which meant this material was spread a long way from the reactor. None of these things have occurred at the Fukushima reactors. The amounts of radiactivity that's been released is many orders of magnitude less than Chernobyl. There has been no massive explosion totally breaching the core vessels. Radioactive materials have barely gone up 500m into the atmosphere meaning the dispersal of radioactive material is minimal and poses no real threat beyond the immediate area around the reactors. Certainly absolutely impossible to pose any threat to any other country. Is it at all possible you can keep a little perspective on what has actually occurred?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




Copyright 2003-2006 Virtual Japan.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6