JapanForum.com  


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
(#11 (permalink))
Old
dxr (Offline)
JF Regular
 
Posts: 46
Join Date: Feb 2011
08-17-2011, 06:32 PM

Thank you both

ANA seems to have just an ever so slight lead it seems. No matter because it seems every day I wait, something drastic happens.

Now there are no ANA or JAL flights in my price range except one JAL flight that is half operated by United (the return trip).

I am conflicted because I havent flown United in a long time, so I don't remember what their service was like.

Ack! I should have just bought last week. Ah well, thanks for the help anyway, guys
Reply With Quote
(#12 (permalink))
Old
JohnBraden's Avatar
JohnBraden (Offline)
Busier Than Shinjuku Station
 
Posts: 1,110
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madrid/Misawa/Chicago
08-17-2011, 07:27 PM

The thing with flights operated by JAL and ANA is that they come to the destination city and turn around for the return trip. There's an AA flight leaving ORD [AA153/154 I think] that is always late in leaving because, once it lands at ORD, it then goes to BOS (Logan). The flight to NRT from ORD originally comes from BOS and if there are delays in that portion of the flight, you know they are compounded once they land at ORD.

That is why I use JAL.... At least the only delay I'll have in leaving ORD is if the flight leaves NRT with a long delay.... Usually foreign airlines aren't that bad with delays here at Chicago.

I'm sure UA is the same way as AA in that the flight then goes somewhere else or comes from somewhere else on its way to Japan. It's a shame you couldn't use either one.....

Last edited by JohnBraden : 08-17-2011 at 07:30 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




Copyright 2003-2006 Virtual Japan.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6