JapanForum.com
Page 3 of 6 < 12 3 45 > Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

JapanForum.com (https://www.japanforum.com/forum/)
-   General Discussion (https://www.japanforum.com/forum/general-discussion/)
-   -   Don’t eat fish! (https://www.japanforum.com/forum/general-discussion/36632-don%E2%80%99t-eat-fish.html)

tipsygypsy 03-17-2011 06:50 AM
I ate 40pieces of sushi for lunch. I'm so full..........*gasp*

Ryzorian 03-17-2011 06:57 AM
More over blown hype, where do these people come from? Most the deaths in Russia were right around the plant, they totaled 50. Several hundred from the local area did develope thyroid cancer. But there wasn't 10's of thousands of deaths. Russia had an exposed core because they never built a containment unit for it. This one has a containment unit, not sure if it's cracked or not.

Radioactive fish?...whatever. :rolleyes:

TalnSG 03-17-2011 03:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoNative (Post 857171)
Truly though as someone who lives here I am really starting to get sick and tired of all these people from around the world who actually believe they know something that the obviously poor, deluded and misled Japanese do not. It truly is a wonder that Japan has been able to become the great nation it is today without all these peoples advice previously!!
:vsign:
You have my support to post that in boldface, enlarged font before every thread on this forum about the subject!

I am fed up with the tear-filled whining and fear-mongering BS that is getting lapped up and reposted continuously. Having been through serious disasters, I expected this for the first 34-48 hours, but this is going on too long.

vegna 03-17-2011 05:16 PM
So i am not supposed to eat this fish?

tokusatsufan 03-17-2011 06:47 PM
Is this gonna be like swine flu? ;)

Eiffel 03-17-2011 08:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by siokan (Post 857103)
Chernobyl
Observed maximum number value
20000 roentgen/hour= about 200000mSievert/hour = 200sV/h

Fukushima
Observed maximum number value
400mSv/h

Your brain is a radioactive contamination.
I think we can't compare these values, where was it taken ? near the reactor ? 200 m from the reactor ? 1 km from the reactor ? we don't know.

protheus 03-17-2011 09:29 PM
Both readings were near the reactors, as in meters. This isn't Chernobil, stop comparing it to that disaster.

Eiffel 03-17-2011 09:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by protheus (Post 857342)
Both readings were near the reactors, as in meters. This isn't Chernobil, stop comparing it to that disaster.
OK near the reactors, but in the air ? on the ground ? i don't say it's Chernobyl, i say we can't compare these readings.

siokan 03-17-2011 09:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eiffel (Post 857334)
I think we can't compare these values, where was it taken ? near the reactor ? 200 m from the reactor ? 1 km from the reactor ? we don't know.
Observation data in the vicinity of nuclear reactor.
A municipality and an individual measurement are displayed in the net by the real time.

I present URL for you.
Google

Eiffel 03-17-2011 10:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by siokan (Post 857346)
Observation data in the vicinity of nuclear reactor.
A municipality and an individual measurement are displayed in the net by the real time.

I present URL for you.
Google
I didn't know what this URL was, thanks a lot, i will use this google now. The things you are saying are true, sorry i'm confused. :o


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:42 AM.
Page 3 of 6 < 12 3 45 > Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6